Yeah I can’t disagree with any particular point here. It’s all just so frustrating.

I mean some people legitimately were not comfortable with supporting any candidate that wouldn’t address the ongoing genocide in Palestine. I voted for Harris, a lot ofpeople did because they understood what was at stake and that obviously Trump would be worse. But there were a lot of people who just couldn’t do it. Yeah I get at a lot of them, but I also would be lying if I said I didn’t understand why they did it.

All this is to say I would not attribute most of those people to “Russia.” We have to talk to them too about how we want to move forward instead of writing them off as brainwashed/incapable of coming to the conclusion on their own.

…Dwight?

I guess it doesn’t bug me so much because it’s not so cringe and actually clearly communicates the point. We do in-house video editing at the company I work at, and when we talk about scaling we’re talking about making sure our processes hold when we add more and more people and increase our volume. It’s a growing company so I have to constantly talk about anticipating and buying things to make sure we don’t run into a wall with our growth.

I guess this is less pushing back and more asking what word you would rather see?

Huh why scalable? I feel like that applies to a lot of things, not just the corporate world.

For those of you saying “well of course “and “everyone knows that,” I think it’s really important to realize how misty eyed everyone is being about the new pope/conclave process. They are not thinking about what he is taking the reins of. If he was complicit, it should be made known to everyone. It should never be forgotten what these men in leadership did.

deleted by creator