• pipes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m exclusively on Pinterest 100hours/week. (I forgot to close the tab with the image search for cool origami)

        • pipes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I was kidding mostly but while travelling (no letters where I was staying) I did recently make, out of basically waste paper, an origami gift card holder I was proud of :) it opens up in the back and you can slide out the card. No tape, no glue. I can look for the website with instructions if you’re interested

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      No one will like hearing this answer but they may already understand the issue of it being bad data and have a good reason not to care.

      Here’s the thing. When “none” or “skip” is there, people gravitate toward it. You end up getting 75% of people saying “none” for every question, and then your entire survey is meaningless. I hate surveys too. Everyone hates them. All the more reason to just mash “skip” or “none.” Because fuck you and fuck your survey.

      Meanwhile, what % of people don’t touch any of these social networks? Maybe we can’t say for sure, but it’s way less than 75%.

      So you’re choosing between two possible sources of bad data, and choosing the one you know to be of lower magnitude.

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Then provide an “other” option with a text box instead.
        Make entering some text mandatory if you click it.
        No one gravitates toward that.
        Besides, a “none” option can just be discarded when you analyze the data.
        If all your boxes are social media sites, you have no idea which ones are poisoned by bad data, and by how much.