• SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    100 MByte/sec. 8 bits per byte, call it 10 when you include overhead / CRC / etc.
    1000 mbit = 100 mbyte

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Sure. My point was that even for 100mbit/s, even UHD could probably still be streamed.

      HDDs can probably max a 1gbit/s connection as well (often get 150MB/s sequential), which is more than sufficient for multiple IHD streams. Moving to 10gbit/s really isn’t needed for anything, and SSDs aren’t needed either to max a gbit/s network, unless doing random reads (i.e. lots of small files).

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        All true. But what if you aren’t just storing media for consumption? What if you’re doing photo editing, video editing, etc? If your NAS is either flash-based or has a flash cache, that extra speed can be really useful.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Are you saying you’d be loading all that data strictly over the network instead of having a local copy that gets synced periodically? That would be terrible on a 100 mbit/s line… If that was my workflow, I’d run 10 gbit/s cable everywhere and make sure clients had at least 2.5G.

          I use my NAS for local backups and streaming when we watch something as a family. 100 mbit/s would be fine for that use case.