• Secret Music@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    So did this UK “centre-left” party turn out to be a Trojan horse or what? They’ve dismantled trans rights. They plan on using AI thought police to ‘predict’ future crimes and criminals. And now they want multibillion corporations to have free access to anyone’s work without compensation.

    If I hadn’t looked this political party up on Wikipedia, by this point I would be assuming that they’re a bunch of conservative wankers on Elon Musk’s payroll.

    • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Is anyone calling UK Labour centre-left? I would have thought theyd be sitting just inside the lower right quadrant of the political compass, they might have been centre left when Corbyn was the leader but that was a while ago and Starmer isn’t that kinda guy.

      • Secret Music@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Wait, so in all these years that Europeans have been making fun of dumb Americans for having a two party system, and for having no real left wing options, the UK has been basically the same?

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Wait, so in all these years that Europeans have been making fun of dumb Americans for having a two party system, and for having no real left wing options, the UK has been basically the same?

          Yes, that’s why Europeans make fun of both the UK and its former colony.

        • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Kind of, its a little more complicated than that, I think its probably more accurate to say they have their own issues. The UK system is pretty different from the shitshow in the US.

          They also use FPTP but have no electoral college and multiple parties including 4 major parties. So while there are multiple parties, in any given electorate you really need to vote for the party you hate the least that has a chance of winning. The two parties in an electorate that have a chance of winning varies across electorates and regions. They also have the House of Lords instead of a senate with members of House mostly being appointed (for life) rather than elected.

          So … its own nonsense. Still seems less shithouse than the US system.

    • Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I looked up the history of UK Parliament a while ago. Since conception there have only ever been two parties in charge: Conservative (used to be called Liberal) and Labour. Before merges and changes the main groups were called Whigs and Tories, both of which primarily became Conservative. Modern Liberals brought back the original Liberal Party, while Liberal Democrats were formed by part of Labour and part of the modern Liberals. They are pretty much identical in terms of actual change.

      The only show of promise is that the Green Party have secured a massive increase in power, and there might actually be a chance of a difference in the next decade.

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 hours ago

        You’ve got the details a little wrong. The original two were the Whigs and the Tories, as you say. The Whigs became the Liberals who became the modern day Liberal Democrats, who still exist but haven’t been in power outside of being a junior member of a coalition for a century. Tories became the Conservatives, who are still one of the major two and are regularly still called the Tories. There was a faction that broke away from the Whigs called the Liberal Unionists, who merged into the Conservatives, but they’re separate from the Liberals. Labour is not a successor to either of them, though they did make some strategic agreements with the Liberals early on. In the early 1900s, Labour replaced the Liberals as one of the two major parties.

        It is still consistently a two-party system. One of the historic parties got replaced and there is a stronger presence for minor parties than there is in the states (see especially the SNP in the past decade and the Tory-LibDem coalition in 2010), but still a two-party system

      • punksnotdead@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Shares of the vote in general elections since 1832 received by Conservatives[note 1] (blue), Liberals/Liberal Democrats[note 2] (orange), Labour (red) and others (grey)[1][2][3]

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_Kingdom_general_elections

        The Conservatives forming from a split in the Liberal party doesn’t mean they’re the same thing.

        Labour and Liberal Democrats are two very different parties. Or at least they used to be, until New Labour became a thing…

        Our politics are bad, FPTP is bad, but we’re not a 2 party system entirely. The Lib Dems, Greens, SNP, and Reform all manage to have a say in politics and how things are done. They all influence Labour and the Conservatives.