• toiletobserver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Profiteering is the wrong word.

    Instead, crony capitalism, abuse of power, or something else is more appropriate

    • Cyberwolf@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Instead, crony capitalism, abuse of power, or something else is more appropriate

      So, standard capitalism stuff?

      • rmuk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        For giggles, I’d like you to explain how the President of the United States launching his old overpriced phone on his own overpriced network with every possible element named, adorned and even priced after himself could be considered anything other than abusing their power?

        • untakenusername@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          he’s just selling something that his followers will buy. no one else really cares to.

          your logic could be even more effectively applied to him selling merchandise about him and that isn’t an overreach of power in any way

      • toiletobserver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        2 days ago

        Using their position of political power to advertise a business which directly benefits them. It is plainly not part of the duties of the office. Same reason good presidents put their financial affairs in a blind trust for the duration of of their term.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Jimmy Carter gave up his tiny peanut farm.

            Yet people nowadays are just incapable of understanding the concept of conflict of interest?

          • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Leveraging his office for profit? Yes. By definition it absolutely is

            He’s already been violating the emoluments clause of the Constitution.