• ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Guevara easily. Kaczynski recognized many issues with the world but blamed it on technological progress rather than the system driving that technological progress and then used it as an excuse to murder people. He wasn’t even very good at the murdering and mostly killed people he did not intend to. Luigi is ideologically confused but iconic for his (alleged) propaganda of the deed. I like him but he isn’t an influence on me. Guevara helped lead a successful revolution that vastly improved the lives of the vast majority of cubans forever. He has contributed to an incalculable good for hundreds of thousands of people. He then became a leftist icon and integral part of so many guerilla movements that were so threatening that the US contracted help from a former nazi to find and kill him. They then attempted to hide is corpse in an unmarked grave in the jungle. It’s not a hard choice. Thats not even mentioning his valuable humanitarian work outside of Cuba and his work within the Cuban government as treasurer.

    • PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Despite hearing Che Guevera’s name sometimes, I’ve never known anything about them. These seem really cool, it’s worthy for a good history podcast about his acts.

    • venusaur@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      What do you think it would take to be a revolutionary in the US today and is anybody on their way there?

      • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Honestly I am not focused on revolution within the US at the moment. Before that is possible we will need revolutions in the imperial periphery that make our empire weak enough to tackle. I have not the slightest clue what it would take to be a revolutionary in the sense that Che was within the US and I don’t think its up to individuals to figure that out. Leaving it to the individual is begging for adventurism. Hell, Che would say America is not ready for an urban Guerrila movement yet anyway. He’d say too many people still trust the electoral system and he’d be damn right. America does not yet have a revolutionary vanguard party so I wouldn’t say anyone is close to being revolutionaries yet. PSL shows promise but they are limited by essentially just being a protest org right now. They also do some education and work with some labor unions but it isn’t all there imo.

        • venusaur@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah most of the US is totally bought into the two party system. The government would have to really fuck everybody in order for people to band together to revolt.