• Etterra@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They hold confession to be inviolate, which is fucking bullshit. Doctors, including psychiatrists, who aren’t allowed to share that shit do have to report certain criminal acts to police.

      Unfortunately all too often freedom of religion translates to freedom from consequences. Fuck the Catholic church (and all churches) in general, but in particular for shit like this. Three Catholic church isn’t unique in this, it’s just got the most rigidly hierarchical, top-down structure of them all.

    • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Note for the internet: I am just clarifying the Catholic stance. I am not Catholic and not defending them.

      Priests cannot reveal what someone tells them in confession. It’s a lot like attorney-client privilege, as your priest is supposed to be your advocate before God. Breaking the seal of confession is a big deal (to them) because, just like criminals deserve representation, sinners need to be able to confess.

      • Mustakrakish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Sinners should be allowed to confess, but not be absolved of consequence or even just be allowed to continue.

        • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          If things worked the way they should you don’t just confess your sin and go about your day. The priest assigns a penance. We are at the edge of my knowledge, and I would love for a Catholic to chime in, but I know penance can be harsh, especially for a grave sin. I’m not sure how it works in practice.

          The idea is certainly not to just allow it to continue. Here we get to obvious failings of the Catholic Church. But, honestly, it’s not like the government is that great about protecting children from powerful men either.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Confession is for stuff you’ve done, not are going to do. Presumably they recognize it was wrong or they wouldn’t go to confession about it.

          I agree it sucks, but I also agree with the comment above yours. Yes, this crime is bad and the people deserve to be caught. I don’t trust the state to always do the right thing though. If we agree with this, we should also agree when they do the same for petty theft, assisting with an illegal abortion, or whatever other crimes they want. This is a slippery slope (not the fallacy) to the state removing protections of any confession, and these people believe if they don’t confess they’ll go to hell, regardless of if they’ll never do it again or if it wasn’t that significant.

    • andrewta@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Now?

      It’s always been this way. There are a few states that require a priest to report child aduse but most don’t require it.

      It’s always been this way.