• dermanus@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Plus it’s worth remembering he does have kids and it would be disruptive for them.

    • CircaV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      So? He’s a fucking multi millionaire & landlord. And right now he’s a fucking grifter and squatter. Is the free market gonna help his non-verbal autistic daughter that he trots out whenever knowledge of her will serve him politically? FUCK. THIS. GRIFTER. MISINFO. DECEITFUL. LYING. OBSTRUCTIONIST. PIECE. OF. SHIT. Waste of skin absolute scumbag. His escualido wife is absolute heinous evil garbage as well.

      • dermanus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        He’s a fucking multi millionaire & landlord.

        What does that have to do with his kids? Do rich kids not have feelings?

        Is the free market gonna help his non-verbal autistic daughter that he trots out whenever knowledge of her will serve him politically?

        Moving twice in six months probably won’t help her.

        None of those are good reasons he should move out for the time it takes him to get a seat back, you’re just angry at the guy.

        • CircaV@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          So rich kids are now an equity seeking group according to you.

          🤦‍♂️

          • dermanus@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            So is your problem that the leader of the opposition gets a house at all, or is it this period where he’s not got a seat but it staying anyway?

            Or just that he in particular is getting a house?

            • CircaV@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              The point is not to unpack why PP is a problem. The point is - that he is a problem. I gave one good reason earlier, that suffices. He’s a hypocrite.

              • HonoredMule@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                If we’re debating what “the point” is, it looks to me like pettiness is the point. Why else would someone get emotionally invested into an issue that isn’t even bothering Poilievre’s own personal political rivals?

                Rich kids are still children and not political pawns. And hypocrisy is the least of my concerns around the party shamelessly espousing shitty values, but a meaningful concern around the parties and leaders that claim to be better.

                If you’re so deeply invested in extracting your pound of flesh, endorse making him pay rent between leadership positions. Alternatively, just choose an issue to champion that is considerably more…productive.