• catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    For fiction, yeah, that’s true. For nonfiction, this could work pretty well.

    I’m still generally opposed to it because it’s using the work of existing voice recording without compensation, though.

    • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      nonfiction, this could work pretty well.

      Only in rare cases.

      If you have for example some explanations to a complex topic, then a super emotionless voice would still make you hate it and block you from learning it. Even the most dry and hard topics need some good and alive voice in explanations.

      If it is just some reference list, where you need to search and hear small parts of it, then it could be Ok.