• InnerScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Why would they? AFAIK it’s less power density for safety gain - which is hard to market. The only way I see it happening is if we find a safer and denser storage medium or if laws force safer batteries.

    • nyan@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      They have less power density than other lithium-ion chemistries when both are new, but the dropoff over time is also less. That means that unless you replace your power banks fairly often, the LiFePO₄ version is likely to have higher density for much of its lifetime. They also tolerate at least double the number of charging cycles.

      Not sure how to go about marketing that in our current disposable society, though.

      • InnerScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Not sure how to go about marketing that in our current disposable society, though.

        Ditto. The most likely solution would be EU regulations forcing longer battery life/better battery safety. Maybe the new law for replaceable batteries in smartphones could be enough, it includes a rating on charging cycles which could be the new “muh number is bigger!”