I understand the historical significance since the nationalists retreated to Taiwan at the end of the Chinese Civil War.

Back then, and for perhaps the middle part of the 20th century, there was a threat of a government in exile claiming mainland China. Historically, then, there was your impetus for invasion.

However, China has since grown significantly, and Taiwan no longer claims to be the government of mainland China, so that reason goes away.

Another reason people give: control the supply of chips. Yet, wouldn’t the Fabs, given their sensitive nature, be likely to be significantly destroyed in the process of an invasion?

Even still, China now has its own academia and engineering, and is larger than Taiwan. Hence, even without the corporate espionage mainland China is known for, wouldn’t investing in their burgeoning semiconductor industry make more sense, rather than spending that money on war?

People mention that taking Taiwan would be a breakout from the “containment” imposed by the ring of U.S. allies in the region.

Yet while taking Taiwan would mean access to deep-water ports, it’s not as though Taiwan would ever pose a threat to Chinese power projection—their stance is wholly defensive. If China decided to pull an “America” and send a carrier to the Middle East or something, no one would stop them and risk a war.

So what is it then? Is it just for national pride and glory? Is it to create a legacy for their leadership? The gamble just doesn’t really seem worth it.

Anyway, appreciate your opinions thanks!

  • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    16 hours ago

    One, it completes one of their long standing policy of “one China”. They still view Taiwan as a rogue rebellion state to bring back into the fold, not an independent country to conquer.

    Two, it would cripple a lot of the west’s high end silicon industry. TSMC is the only one that can make the worlds most advanced nodes, as well as Taiwan holds chip packaging infrastructure that any other nodes require on to be useful.

    To that end it is a geopolitical chip that China can use to pressure the west, but likely will never act upon until a real hot war breaks out.

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They still view Taiwan as a rogue rebellion state to bring back into the fold, not an independent country to conquer.

      I think this should never be mentioned without also pointing out that the island of Taiwan has never been a part of China.

      • novibe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        In what way…? Taiwan has been a part of all Chinese states for centuries.

          • novibe@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Literally since before the US was even a thing… so yes, all, for centuries.

        • rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          So? Before Qing dynasty taiwan was not part of china and became part through conquests. Taiwan has the right to be a separate entity what they dfon’t have right to is to becone the usa puppet and threten china security and the interests that they have right to

          • novibe@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Taiwan has been a part of China for far longer than the US has existed. Or that Hawaii has been part of the US. And there’s pretty good support for independence in Hawaii…

            • rumimevlevi@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              It doesn’t matter. Polities reunify and separate all the time in history. The idea that a polity once becoming part of another can’t separate again is so dumb

              • novibe@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                So if a rebel army lost a civil war in the US, fled to Hawaii, set up a military dictatorship that exploits and genocides native Hawaiians, we should all just accept that as cool and fine? As long as 50 years have passed and the only people left are the children of the rebels and military dictators who support their “state”?

                Edit: also while being supported by China and Russia and all the while having war games where they invade the US from Hawaii 😂

    • crimsonpoodle@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It would cripple it now but TSMC has started building Fabs in North America— but it would certainly cripple its output in the short term— then again, the U.S governments current incompetence not withstanding, you would think that if that ever happened the U.S would be able to emergency build Fabs within a few (2-4?) years if necessary.

      • thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        15 hours ago

        From what I know, it’s not that simple. Those are very complex and delicate processes, so the 2 to 4 years timeline sounds quite optimistic.

        Also, it’s entirely possible TSMC doesn’t want to transfer the entirety of its knowledge to the US, as it basically guarantees the US would intervene in the case of an invasion to protect the supply of advanced chips.

      • drspectr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        The fabs themselves aren’t the only limiting factor on modern lithography, skill is the bigger one; this stuff is probably more complicated than rocket science. We US engineers dont have the skills to run a competitive fab in the US, that takes many years of losing money to be developed. Intel has bigger better EUV machines than TSMC but they just cant compete and intel keeps laying off their engineers constantly which is a very bad signal.

        Also, last time I was reading on the topic TSMC doesn’t plan to produce advanced chips on their US fabs to gatekeep their knowledge.