• JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      They never saw the vote. They can’t count it, it has to go to court. They’re following the law.

      • abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        They’re following the law.

        Never stated otherwise.

        They never saw the vote. They can’t count it,

        I get what you’re saying, but it’s still disturbing that EC can cause a mistake of this nature and not have the ability to rectify it.

        Certainly this isn’t the worst case of disenfranchisement by Elections Canada (see for example https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/article/this-is-unacceptable-polling-station-problems-prompt-calls-for-investigation/ )

        it has to go to court.

        Thinking it over, there’s a good counterargument here. Even if EC could directly order a by-election in this case (or even was given the power to just outright count the vote), someone would contest this and it’d likely end up before a judge at some point anyways. So might as well just go direct.

    • Underfreyja@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Then make an application to a judge to challenge the result and they will have to count it.

      Truly, it should be the BQ that does it. I’m guessing they will in the coming days.

      • Then make an application to a judge to challenge the result and they will have to count it.

        I’m not sure that I’m eligible to do this…

        Truly, it should be the BQ that does it. I’m guessing they will in the coming days.

        Agreed. This isn’t so bad, at least there’s a way forward.