There already is a solution. Parents need to be involved in restricting what their kids are viewing. Thats the solution, but parents dont want to do that, they want the sites to do the job for them.
Nope. Its already been tried. The internet is too ubiquitous.
And that’s like saying, all liquor stores should not require ID, and it’s the parents fault if an underage kid acquires some booze.
Silly.
Im following along perfectly fine. You’re the one not comprehending the fallacies in your argument, but nice try. Im done responding to you after this though anyway cause its obvious you aren’t interested in actually listening and learning.
Why stop at porn? Any objectionable words (like darn or poop), or any form of non-consensual contact (including Three Stooges pies in the face) must require photo ID to access. The internet is for everyone, after all.
I mean, nice quote… I like it. But Steve’s a comedian.
OR, If the pilot was a kid you’d say the authority that gave that kid a pilot’s license without checking his age is the one who fucked up.
Don’t be dumb, this isnt even close to the same thing.
The “thing” is how to age gate materials on the internet. I said I’m up for a solution. What’s yours?
There already is a solution. Parents need to be involved in restricting what their kids are viewing. Thats the solution, but parents dont want to do that, they want the sites to do the job for them.
Nope. Its already been tried. The internet is too ubiquitous.
And that’s like saying, all liquor stores should not require ID, and it’s the parents fault if an underage kid acquires some booze.
Silly.
Again, liquor store and this aren’t even remotely the same. So your example is irrelevant. Silly.
This is about age restriction which is entirely the same. You can stop commenting now because I don’t think you’re following along.
Im following along perfectly fine. You’re the one not comprehending the fallacies in your argument, but nice try. Im done responding to you after this though anyway cause its obvious you aren’t interested in actually listening and learning.
“I’m done responding…”
Thanks.
Why stop at porn? Any objectionable words (like darn or poop), or any form of non-consensual contact (including Three Stooges pies in the face) must require photo ID to access. The internet is for everyone, after all.
No that’s not how the world works. All things are not for everybody. Ask any parent. Your kids do not get to run free and do whatever they want.
Exactly. So why should we require ID for porn and not for a bad word?
If you don’t know the answer to that then you’re not a parent are you?
To quote Steve Hofstadder, I’m not a helicopter pilot either but if I see one in a tree I know someone fucked up.
I mean, nice quote… I like it. But Steve’s a comedian.
OR, If the pilot was a kid you’d say the authority that gave that kid a pilot’s license without checking his age is the one who fucked up.
I just don’t see possibly keeping kids away from internet porn is a worthy trade off in providing even more of our information to companies.