Belgium has dropped nuclear phaseout plans adopted over two decades ago. Previously, it had delayed the phaseout for 10 years over the energy uncertainty triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Belgium’s parliament on Thursday voted to drop the country’s planned nuclear phaseout.

In 2003, Belgium passed a law for the gradual phaseout of nuclear energy. The law stipulated that nuclear power plants were to be closed by 2025 at the latest, while prohibiting the construction of new reactors.

In 2022, Belgium delayed the phaseout by 10 years, with plans to run one reactor in each of its two plants as a backup due to energy uncertainty triggered by Russia’s war in Ukraine.

    • stickly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      What do people mean by “less efficient” in these conversations? Energy generated is energy generated, the number one efficiency we should talk about is using less of it. Past that you’re just choosing to optimize for cost, ecological impact, carbon footprint, etc…

      • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        So by that logic we should build energy sources that need the smallest input to get running. That’s not nuclear, hence the “less efficient”.

    • Lemzlez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Renewables needing expensive storage isn’t an opinion either.

      We all want a clean, efficient, and reliable power grid. Renewables should be a big part, and I’d prefer not having a bunch of hydrocarbons being burned whenever renewables don’t even cover the base load.