cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/29061644

We’ve done it, we got rid of another soulless right wing politician!

Peter Dutton first made his party lose this election and now also lost his own seat much like Pierre Pullover

We’ve still got a government that green-lit new coal power plants in it’s last term, screwed over the Aboriginal community with a poorly run referendum, and still doesn’t give a shit about climate change, but baby steps hey.

      • dellish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Significantly partially. In January Dutton started to style himself after Trump, even going so far as getting tips from the GOP, after Trump’s win. However by mid-March Dutton was trying to backpedal rapidly but it was too late. Clearly not all his staff got the memo (esp Jacinta Price… oh dear) and everything he did or said could be met with a variation of “hold on, last week you were saying x”.

        Also I’d like to once again say thanks to the founders that gave us compulsory, preferential voting.

        • __dev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          thanks to the founders that gave us compulsory, preferential voting

          Not sure if sarcastic or not, but it made me look up when these things were introduced. Preferential voting was 1918 by Billy Hughes Nationalist Party. Compulsory voting was a state thing, starting with QLD in 1925 and ending with SA in 1942.

          • dellish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Not sarcastic, but rereading it now I can see why you’d say that. I’m grateful for preferential voting because there were a lot of seats that had Liberal first preference majorities that swung on preference counts. I wasn’t actually aware that preferential voting came along 17 years after federation and that it was the states that gradually brought in compulsory voting… and now in wondering why, and what happened to cause us to shift away from the British model we were no doubt following beforehand. Thanks for the new rabbit hole!

  • Grail (capitalised)@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Nobody wants to let Dutton be another Trump

    Trump is dismantling the US government so his billionaire friends can buy it. He’s not building a global populist movement, he’s siezed power and he’s using it for petty, selfish ends. The whole world can see it plainly

    The rise of fascism in the US may have heralded worldwide rises in conservativism for a time, but now that Trump has absolute power, he’s not bothering to hide his intentions. It’s swung back the other way, now the US is making the world less fascist

    Fascism’s win condition is always its own destruction. It’s a death cult. It can’t win worldwide because it promotes selfish leaders who sabotage the movement for personal enrichment

    It’s gonna be okay, everyone

    • Zippygutterslug@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 days ago

      They’re not going to stop trying just because they lost an election. Don’t become complacent. Victory has not yet been accomplished, defeat has been postponed.

      Fascism is an existential threat to all democratic countries.

      • g0nz0li0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 days ago

        The Australian Liberal party (note, they’re the Conservative Party) has taken an anti-climate change to the Australian electorate for a decade. Over time they lost power, they lost seats to independents who are aligned to Liberal party except on climate change, and now they’ve been reduced to a puddle due in part to their anti-climate agenda. There’s practically zero chance that the Liberal Party will ever campaign on an anti-Climate Change platform (despite what their corporate overlords want). Which means we may finally have clean air for a debate on policy and politics that’s not being hijacked by bullshit fossil fuel arguments.

        This is progress, for sure.

        • kingofras@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 days ago

          Not sure. I can see them go full Trump and get aligned with our extreme right wing parties and billionaires and make their own truth social and just double down hard calling it a hoax. All the flooding is just weather engineering with chemtrails, didn’t you know?

          • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 days ago

            That seems unlikely based on last night’s outcome.

            Trumpism has a stink on it.

            Dutton was trotting out some Trump rhetoric in the last 2 weeks and Australian voters have issued an emphatic, resounding rejection.

            I expect a reformed liberal party will go back to their roots of fiscal and social conservatism, but do anything to avoid the culture war.

              • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                I’m not sure that’s the right message to take away from what’s happened.

                Rejecting Dutton because he was stoking the culture war from the conservative end, does not mean that the electorate will embrace a leader who stokes the culture war from the progressive end.

                For example, the voice to parliament was part of the culture war, and it failed spectacularly for Labor. They were lucky to recover really.

                That’s not to say the electorate doesn’t want trans rights, but voters do want someone who’s going to address the bread and butter problems they’re facing.

                • Grail (capitalised)@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  but voters do want someone who’s going to address the bread and butter problems they’re facing.

                  Nah mate, common myth. The Greens had a way better plan for the bread and butter problems - create a government department for building housing, end negative gearing, cap rent increases, put dental in medicare, build free GP clinics, 50c transport fares, wipe all student debt, 800$ back to school payment, free school lunches, make supermarket price gouging illegal, increase wages.

                  What voters want, is something comfortable and familiar that makes them feel like they’re opposing Trump, without having to actually think or learn anything. They want the status quo.