• 0 Posts
  • 7 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: November 19th, 2023

help-circle
  • Before anyone jumps on this guy’s bandwagon cuz its fuck musk sentiment, look at his proposal from a net neutrality perspective. The chairman who opposed passing 2017’s title II net neutrality legislation is proposing more crack downs on everyone’s access to alternate ISP options.

    THE FCC HAS AMD ALWAYS WILL BE IN THE POCKET OF THE MAJOR INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS WHOSE MAIN GOAL IS TO BOTTLENECK EVERYONE INTO ONLY HAVING ACCESS TO THE INTERNET THROUGH ONE PROVIDER FOR AN AREA SO THEY CAN IMPLEMENT POLICIES LIKE BADWIDTH THROTTLING, CENSORSHIP AND ELIMINATING PIRATING CHANNELS. The only defense we have against losing net neutrality is by lowering their customer retention rates when customers jump to other companies. Which is only effective when there aren’t regulations limiting the number of competing providers.

    There are plenty of reasons and justifications for saying fuck musk but this is not one that is worth the potential cost to your net neutrality.


  • Or you could just read the first paragraph of an article you are guna put the effort into expressing your opinion over. The chair of the FCC is saying if DODGE guts the FCC under the guise of reducing the operating cost to save on tax revenues then all they will be doing is reducing the country’s access to affordable high speed internet. Subsequently pushing more people to use starlink.

    This took more waaaay more time to write than it took to read. Maybe instead of needing information spoon fed to you, you could save others who share this platform the hassle of being your personal chatgpt by simply skimming an article you could see yourself forming enough of an opinion to comment on.🍻



  • Woman: fears for her life and the police do nothing so she disappears for 60 years Cops: “Women can be so flighty!”

    How to tell people you were born after 2000 without telling them you were born after 2000.

    What do you expect the cops could even do in the 60’s to help the woman? Press charges or arrest the husband? Oh wait the first comprehensive domestic abuse laws weren’t even made until the 1970’s.

    Ok well I assume you would then want the cops to take her to a battered women clinic? Oh wait that wasn’t a thing either at that time either!

    Have the cops advise her to get a divorce? Ha, only gays, whores and hobos didn’t marry for life back then.

    Cops wouldn’t have even investigated the abuse part of the complaint, they wouldve investigated the threats of murder that were made but its not like they could obtain any physical evidence like text message transcripts or emails or phone logs. They wouldve gone to the house, asked the hisband if he threatened to kill his wife and he would say no and that would be the end of it.

    I apologize if im off in my assumption you are under 25y/o but the context of your comment jumping to the cop’s incompetence throws enough flags to assume you didn’t experience much of what the world was like before the internet.

    The real take away from this article should be the absolute balls on this woman for taking action into her own hands and never turning back. I respect the fuck out of this woman.