In most jurisdictions you have 2 kinds of courts, criminal and civil. Criminal is the government accusing a person or entity of breaking a law and saying they should be punished (fines, confinement, death, etc). Civil is a person or entity accusing another person or entity of harming them in some way and saying they should be punished with a fine. Both trials can technically happen at the same time but they tend to avoid doing that for various reasons.

I kinda feel like you are intentionally missing the point of the feedback you are getting and pretending like any pushback you get is related to your one specific grievance despite people being pretty clear about what they are saying.

Let’s point out the guy they shot at was all in black, went behind a wall and started assembling his rifle, then when confronted by the peacekeepers HIRED BY THE PROTEST ORGANIZERS he ran away into the crowd while lifting his rifle into firing position.

I’m a type 1 too, I hear ya. Funnily enough when I encounter people who don’t really understand T1D I tell them to watch the Studio C skit “Diabetes Intervention”, they absolutely nail it.

There does sound like a lot of confusion in the article, it says hyperglycemia, then says suspected low blood sugar. Those are opposites. Giving insulin for hyperglycemia would be correct. Then later it says she was regularly running high, 200 to 300, which definitely is not good but not immediately life threatening. It honestly sounds like this lady didn’t know what she was doing and made no effort to learn, plus she may have been shilling some weird “alternative” products which is bad…

Better but much more expensive insulin, although price has gone down significantly since Affordable Care act.