
Banned pesticides and fertilizers are banned because they leave traces that are harmful to the human body. Otherwise they generally won’t be banned in the first place. So all they have to do is take random samples and do proper checks. If it was impossible to detect the presence of after effects of such banned substances, there would be no point in banning them since the end product would be no different from normally grown varieties, hence no reason to ban them.
That said, I don’t know how good our processes are, but I do think that more funding needs to be allocated now since the FDA won’t be doing any of their own testing. Turning cargo back at the inspection centers would be an easy way to ban US foods without changing a single law or policy in the country with a high degree of deniability that this was the intent in the first place.
I’m hesitant on solar in the first place. It’s marginally economical in Southern Ontario, but far worse so anywhere else and will require quite a lot of land clearing to make work even before considering the usual issues with it. Wind is good, but I’m with you on nuclear. That’s the way to go, and Canada is making good progress on new nuclear projects. We’re one of the tops in the world for nuclear technology and have one of the world’s largest uranium reserves.
That said, I think it’s only the prairies that even have coal plants anymore? Ontario hasn’t had coal in two decades, and Quebec is virtually a hydro superpower. If I remember right, for electricity generation, 70% is already non-carbon emitting. The real problems I believe are the vehicles and heating homes with natural gas. Oh, and apparently resource extraction is the second greatest source of CO2 in Canada.
But really, 20% comes from cars and trucks and is the single greatest source of CO2 in Canada by a massive margin apparently. And we just scrapped the only effective way to fight that source.