Yeah, like most cults it doesn’t seem like it’s so bad on the surface, but once you start digging deeper into it things very quickly go off the rails.

The nation of Islam is not without fault of it’s own though, none that justified the actions of the state, but still not exactly a beacon of morality.

How is taking the right to fight it in state court away pro state rights?

So you’re just going to completely misread an article and make an ass of yourself and not even own up to it?

I think state rights should mean that a state has the ability the challenge the laws that govern it. This bill specifically has wording to prevent that, it’s the entire reason this article was posted. Please explain to me how stripping a states population of its rights to challenge a bill that governs them is suppose to be for their rights?

It’s only state rights in the senses that it’s eroding them.