What’s your agenda here with these broad generalizations exactly?

That’s my intrepretation of it as well but that doesn’t really offer any solutions or clarity to the current situation. In most conflicts like this you can always go even further back in history to justify your cause.

If this escalates into a all out war I’m curious to see whose side the average Lemmy user will be taking. I tried doing some research into the history of this conflict and it seems so messy that from my point of view pretty much both sides are to blame.

This would only work if the people in the firing squad had never shot a gun before. There’s no recoil with blanks. You’d be able to immediately tell.

Of all the ways to die, getting shot is among the quickest and least painful ones. I’d honestly probably choose that over drugs.

People are different height and don’t stand still just to name a few.

Anti-vax people don’t generally hold that stance because they’re evil. They’re misinformed. Doctor willing to sedate a person whose about to get murdered and one that’s sceptical about vaccines is not equivalent.

Losing weight is almost entirely about diet. Exercise plays only a minimal role in that. It’s far easier to not eat something than to burn off those same calories through working out. That’s not to say exercise isn’t important - it is - but you do it for reasons other than weight loss.

Well you should be banned for that. You’re not bringing in any value to the conversation - just poisoning the air for everyone else. You’re why social media is so toxic.