… then what it’s?

Fuck…

I got my post removed and got banned from instances when I posted this.

• Brave is more secure than Firefox, in terms of sandboxing capabilities that it inherits from chromium.
• Brave includes a default adblocker and use their own search engine, compared to Firefox which does not have a default adblocker and uses Google as the default search engine.
• Brave is more efficent in terms of CPU and GPU usage, while Firefox is more efficient in terms of Ram usage.
• Brave is relatively stable(Not a lot of surprising changes) compared to Firefox.
• Brave is better looking out of the box(Wallpapers, New Tab Page (NTP) Customization and built-in Themes).

This shows that you have great empathy.

But what if a person came and ask you explicitly for money, will you give them?

But what if the poor person who is asking you for money, is unable to access any help or charity?

I know that the easy answer is to not give any money to beggars and to only give it to charities, but that also has its own set of problems.

Calling them “beggers” is shitty and outdated…

Go on… what is the newer term?

you should be saying what geographic area you’re in

Nice try, CIA.

Remove Capitalism, then what?

Dickish World.

guaranteed basic income

This has been studied a lot of times and mostly there is usually 2 concerns:

• How you will finance the whole thing?
• How do people act when you give them extra money?

Now, for the first concern: I had never seen anyone even answer it theoretically.

For the second concern: there is a mixed results, some studies suggest that people productivity gets lower, others suggest otherwise.

I don’t see this even applied in a small village.

Just to be clear, I am talking about the widely known UBI, there is NIT and even other universal welfare schemes. IMO, even other universal welfare schemes has their own set of unsolved issues, and very experimental and idealistic in nature.

OK, let us try again here.

Poverty and hunger.

How do you do that?

That is from my opinion, impossible to achieve.

• Human suffering.
• Climate Change.

Are you sure they are shouting “No” and not “नहीं” ?

In all seriousness, would there be any reason that would make this news significant, aka newsworthy?

I am asking because without reading the article it seems like the only interested people would be Indians.

Am I wrong here?

Don’t pretend . You know what it mean

Care to spill it out clearly?

Google is one of main donors of Linux and KDE.

What is your point?

End occupation and let punish war criminals from both side

Sure?

Your arguments are so deep and detailed…

The first official acknowledgment by the UN of the use of sexual violence during the attacks came some five months after October 7. Then, following a mission to Israel, the UN’s Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict Pramila Patten published a report concluding there were reasonable grounds to believe conflict-related sexual violence occurred in multiple locations, and that there was clear and convincing evidence that hostages in Gaza were subjected to sexual assaults.

These testimonies, coupled with forensic reports and photographs and videos from the attacks, led them to conclude that Hamas used sexual violence in a widespread, systematic and “tactical” way as a “weapon of war.”

The platforms I mentioned are not for posting links at all.

They are for sharing knowledge and advocating for action in groups at the local City/State level.