How is this infuriating? Businesses have ads.

And I keep reminding people there is a City Council that will limit some of his policies that they find issues with like a $30 minimum wage.

Considering neither party seemed to want this info shared I believe we all need to know what was in it.

He needs the smaller donor crowd to step up and have his supporters continue to engage with NYC voters over their issues and not get distracted by racist bullshit dostractions such as his position on Israel.

Probably not, how much do you look like a dad?

This isn’t a church. It is a PAC that is doing this. If you buy Chick Fil A they are whom you are supporting.

Yeah living near NYC there are so many great free shows that you can easily find new favorites.

This Thursday Big Freeda is doing a show in Brooklyn for free.

Except it’s wrong. 40% are independents so a 50/50 split cannot happen.

This is a shitty poll as it splits everyone 50/50 and neither party has the plurality of voters.

I have a Harris tweed Teapot Cozy. It is one of my favorite things in my kitchen. I should have thought of that.

So you are only capable of ad hominem discussions? That really speaks to your intellectual skills.

You know you can just be opposed to authoritarianism. Most decent folk are.

What article? It’s not the article being discussed and your google link sucks for the reasons already explained.

You need to provide a source if you are quoting one.

No, there isn’t. Anyone claiming to support the liberation of the working classes while praising authoritarian systems that are cracking down on those populations looking for freedom are hypocrites.

It’s weird you would make this about geographic location. Are you doing that because you don’t have a valid critique?

Nope, that’s been used for decades you are just seeing the limitations of google’s tools as it happened in places they do not index

This wasn’t an editorial. It was a snarky comment that you inappropriately are trying to make into an argument because you completely misread the situation

I think you need to be actually arguing with someone to make an argument against them, yes. You cannot make an argument when you aren’t doing so. You need to be debating to make logical fallacies. No one was doing that hence no one made a strawman argument.

Do you need this further explained? No argument was made. The side you are claiming I am making a strawman argument against is not present. There is no debate.

You used it wrong. Learn from this and move on. Don’t misuse them in the future.

You cannot present a strawman argument when the side you are arguing against isn’t present. Thus I was not making a straw man. That’s just insulting tankies

Don’t bring these up unless you understand them and in this case you do not.

They never made a straw man argument because they qualify it with the second part that you cut off. Why did you do that?

It seems you might not understand what downvotes are for then. Downvotes are for things that do not contribute to discussion so things like insults or actively dangerous suggestions should be downvoted.

Suggesting what is a very typical path to addiction for addicts is very bad advice and should not be shared. When someone is foolish enough to do so it should be downvoted because the whole discussion is toxic