Actually, yea. You do

For now.

You’re still wrong though. So you got that going for you, which is nice.

🤣

Yes, musk is a nazi. That’s why I am calling a nazi. I’m not calling everyone, nor anyone a nazi, only nazis and their nazi ilk

Smdh

No, they are nothing alike, at all.

You: "either everything is “A” or everything is “B”, there is no alternatives.

See how silly that is?

Also you: *proceeds to call everyone I don’t like nazi or hitler

The fucking kind of mental gymnastics are those? Jfc try harder buddy.

Yes I call nazis nazis, but not everyone I dislike is a nazi, nor do I call them that hahaha.

It really isn’t. It’s not even close. You said I had gold medal mental gymnastics, but you’ve just done another gold medal performance.

E: but thank you for pointing out my typo

No? I don’t like lots of people, and only the far right fascist supporters, and nazis, and nazi simps I call nazis. I didn’t call elon, Hitler. So go stroke your ego elsewhere

All the nazis saw it as a nazi salute too! They were chuffed! Let’s not ignore his love and support for the afd, and antisemites on Twitter!

It’s not

It is.

Yes, the way you say two, very very different things are the same is certainly gold medal worthy mental gymnastics. Well said.

Here’s the full, non cropped video. It’s around the 1:51 mark.

https://www.youtube.com/live/2wU99gDi_M8

Yes notice the crisp snappy way waltz did it? With fingers together, and twice so there is no way to doubt what it was? Ohhh wait sorry that was elons.

He’s certainly a fascist autocrat

One of these things is not like the other

You’ve called the good guys here the nazis and let the actual authoritarians off the hook scott-free.

Only if you ignore that Twitter is owned by a nazi, and that the person above didn’t say anything about letting, the authoritarian regime in turkey off the hook.

'Member when they bivied in chernobyl and dug trenches into the irradiated ground?

Why…what? Why would they remove the information about programs that no longer exist? Because they no longer exist. The information is no longer relevant, and leaving it up would only cause confusion

Uhuh, but why?

CenSURE and cenSOR are very different things. Are you claming that the removal of the DEI stuff from the government websites is censuring or censoring?

Censors can censure.

Last chance then I’ll correctly assume that there are no sources on there that support the “gay erasure” argument.

It won’t be correct, plugging your ears, And closing your eyes isn’t “correctly assuming”