

01·
4 days agoOf course, because ads have zero bandwidth. /s
Are you an idiot?
Of course, because ads have zero bandwidth. /s
Are you an idiot?
You’re stupid and naive. 20 elections voting for 20 not 21 genocides results in dramatically fewer genocides. Instead you now get exponentially more with your stupid purity test.
Well to help convince us you could denounce all Nazis and racial hatred, especially on your social platform.
We’re still waiting.
An entire team.
A study published in a medical journal showed that Facebook (primarily) along with other social media was responsible for the rise in teenage suicide in girls. Let that sink in.
No, raw bandwidth savings would likely be very significant. You do realize that for many webpages the ads are most of the bandwidth? On my network (I have capped internet so this is important) if I run dns ad blocking my total bandwidth is 40% less.