lad

I re-read your comment and now I think I got the meaning better. Distasteful surely must be protected but that wasn’t my point, my point was that hate-speech is often not distasteful is is harmful. It seems that it is not harmful enough, and if a hateful tweet doesn’t make people go on a witch-hunt it’s ok? That seems to be literal reading of the rules, but I find it lacking often.

Still, as others pointed out, whatever the rule is, it is used for oppressing the opposition

This link kinda contradicts the thing you said about principles in my opinion. But then again, I should educate myself more on the matter

I’m a bit torn on this, because it looks like doxxing someone or driving them to suicide on-line should also be considered free speech and protected.

Although maybe it’s more about the fact that you may be held accountable for what you say but can’t be banned from saying it? But then again all the protesters would be prosecuted the same way.

In the end, I think the problem with hate-speech law enforcement is in the ones who do the enforcement and not in the fact that these laws exist. As far as I know, pretty much every law can be stretched enough to oppress someone if you’re hellbent on doing that and have a broken law enforcement (which seems rather common nowadays)

So, the only free speech you care about is one that gives you freedom to be a biggot, a racist, or some other petty hater?

It’s a good thing there are no scammers that could try stealing IDs pretending to verify you 😌

That’s just universal problem ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Bottle kind of looks like it’s for an abrasive cleaning powder for kitchen

I feel like this is an any world problem T_T

Every time I wonder why they decided to call a button ‘Turbo’ if fast was the default mode

Higher in this thread they said the author does provide a flatpak, so this didn’t seem to work ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

This is an interesting finding, but there are two important things to keep in mind: they only reviewed some illnesses, and even there one had better cure rate for longer treatment, this means we need a lot more studies. And another one I will quote from the article you linked:

You should still follow your doctor’s instructions about the length of antibiotic therapy.

If you are feeling better and think that you may not need the entire course, be sure to ask your doctor first.

Considering that many will not be able to ask a doctor on time to stop early, both because it may cost extra and because there’s usually a waiting list of who knows how long, it seems unrealistic to expect real change soon.

So, I partially agree with you and will try to spread the info and ask doctors about this, but I think it should rather be seen as a need for more studies. Maybe there already are more, the article is from 2017, but right now I don’t have time to search for that.

Thank you for the information

And you have sources? Because last time I checked this was the worst way of doing it, as you leave enough bacteria to try and mutate into resistivity.

If you already had resistant bacteria, taking antibiotics wouldn’t heal you for long anyway, tried it first hand a few months ago.