As someone who used to use arch for years, I can’t stand its users who go around acting like running it is some herculean task that takes serious knowledge.
In reality its not much more than a misbehaved pet that requires constant attention and a blog post to be read every month or so. Not because its hard, but because its updates are just kinda slapped together and tossed out in the name of speed.
One of the biggest indicators of this is the AUR. For what it was worth, the Gentoo crowd it replaced at least knew how to compile a program.
Maybe learn to use git, tar, and make like literally anyone else on any other fucking distro.
I feel like I’d need to check the wiki less if pacman had flags that made more sense lol. Plus so many variations of commands the wiki warns “this will break your shit”.
I really like Arch, I’m using CachyOS, it’s been great. But I do miss apt lol. Maybe that’s just because I was used to it though. Update and upgrade being two totally different things is also extremely counterintuitive.
I don’t use Arch but I have noticed a growing number of forums where people seem to talk about a lot of problems. I have used Gentoo, Debian, Ubuntu etc. But Arch stands out as the distro that seems to have the most helpless users. Or is it the most broken distro?
I use arch on a couple of machines and for a rolling release I find it surprisingly hassle free. So with a scientifically relevant sample size of one ;) - I declare that it’s the people that are the problem.
That is with regular updates though.
I also have a gentoo box that is fine if you let it update every week or two, but tends to need more love and attention if you turn it on again after half a year. I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s the same for arch. Users who only update twice a year aren’t really the target audience for rolling release.
It probably also depends on your hardware and what your usecases are; as always using the right tool for the job helps
As someone who used to use arch for years, I can’t stand its users who go around acting like running it is some herculean task that takes serious knowledge.
In reality its not much more than a misbehaved pet that requires constant attention and a blog post to be read every month or so. Not because its hard, but because its updates are just kinda slapped together and tossed out in the name of speed.
One of the biggest indicators of this is the AUR. For what it was worth, the Gentoo crowd it replaced at least knew how to compile a program.
Maybe learn to use git, tar, and make like literally anyone else on any other fucking distro.
I feel like I’d need to check the wiki less if pacman had flags that made more sense lol. Plus so many variations of commands the wiki warns “this will break your shit”.
I really like Arch, I’m using CachyOS, it’s been great. But I do miss apt lol. Maybe that’s just because I was used to it though. Update and upgrade being two totally different things is also extremely counterintuitive.
I don’t use Arch but I have noticed a growing number of forums where people seem to talk about a lot of problems. I have used Gentoo, Debian, Ubuntu etc. But Arch stands out as the distro that seems to have the most helpless users. Or is it the most broken distro?
I use arch on a couple of machines and for a rolling release I find it surprisingly hassle free. So with a scientifically relevant sample size of one ;) - I declare that it’s the people that are the problem.
That is with regular updates though.
I also have a gentoo box that is fine if you let it update every week or two, but tends to need more love and attention if you turn it on again after half a year. I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s the same for arch. Users who only update twice a year aren’t really the target audience for rolling release.
It probably also depends on your hardware and what your usecases are; as always using the right tool for the job helps
Two of us at least! Arch has been the most hassle free of any distro I’ve used.
Solved my distro hopping 13 yrs ago