Belgium has dropped nuclear phaseout plans adopted over two decades ago. Previously, it had delayed the phaseout for 10 years over the energy uncertainty triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Belgium’s parliament on Thursday voted to drop the country’s planned nuclear phaseout.

In 2003, Belgium passed a law for the gradual phaseout of nuclear energy. The law stipulated that nuclear power plants were to be closed by 2025 at the latest, while prohibiting the construction of new reactors.

In 2022, Belgium delayed the phaseout by 10 years, with plans to run one reactor in each of its two plants as a backup due to energy uncertainty triggered by Russia’s war in Ukraine.

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Clean might be debatable, but scalable is just obviously wrong. There is nothing even close to solar and wind when it comes to scalability. When your goal is scalability, anything that takes more than 1-2 years per plant to set up is just worthless. We cant just wait another 20 years for nuclear to make a comeback at this point, its not an option.

    • Lembot_0002@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Solar and wind aren’t scalable well. Try to increase power output, let’s say, x3. How well is it going? Building additional 2 reactors is completely straightforward.

      • joonazan@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        We still have a lot of roofs that could have solar on them. Scaling up nuclear will deplete fuel mines faster because the isotopes that are legal due to arms treaties are pretty limited.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        What? This is what generation capacity looks like in Germany. Solar has gone up 50x in the last 20 years, 2.7x in the last 10 years. We could keep scaling faster, but there is just no need.

        We dont need more sources, we need more storage. We already have plenty of surplus solar/wind generation capacity that is being turned off because the grid is lacking storage. We really only need more storage and as you can see from this chart, that is whats happening. This year battery storage filled with solar and wind will probably supply more energy than nuclear did over a year at its peak.

      • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Uh hu… so you are arguing, in good faith, that it’s easier(?), safer(?), cheaper(?), faster(?) to build deveral nuclear reactors than building a couple more wind- and solar parks?

            • abbadon420@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Why the name calling? The guy is obviously wrong, but calling them delusional is not useful in any way. You’re only spoiling this community

                • abbadon420@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Lmao

                  when you think something is funny or you intend it as a joke

                  You’re basically pointing and laughing.

                  Cyberbullying

                  the activity of using the internet to harm or frighten another person, especially by sending them unpleasant messages