• 11111one11111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    46
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I know this will get downvoted for not shitting on trump in some way but this sounds like hes telling walmart’s corporate board members to take the revenue loss at their own expense without passing the cost increase to their customers. If Bernie said this it would get a standing ovation. Fuck everything else Trump tho.

    • MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The difference is that Bernie:

      • would be advocating on behalf the American consumer.
      • wouldn’t have done this wild-ass tariff nonsense to begin with

      Whereas Trump:

      • is a narcissist who is angry that Walmart is making him look bad.
      • because he caused the problem

      I can appreciate when a stopped clock is correct, but i wouldn’t rely on it the rest of the time.

      • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Bernie supports targeted tariffs on low wage countries like China. He disagrees that tariffs on higher wage countries, like Germany, are a good idea.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      That’s not a fair comparison, because Trump created the tariffs. If Bernie has instituted tariffs, there would be a purpose and a plan. Trump doesn’t have a plan, or whatever his plan was it isn’t going the way he wanted. He wants the Waltons to eat the loss to make his plan look better. It has nothing to do with income inequality or wealth redistribution. It’s ego. Trump took a steamy wet shit on the carpet and he wants the rest of the world to clean it up.

    • Troy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Bernie would have arrived with a plan, at at least something better than a concept of a plan. Assuming he decided to put tariffs on China, he probably would have raised tariffs slowly, announcing everything clearly in advance. So the market has time to spin up alternatives instead of sudden shocks causing inflation.

    • KelvarIW@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I know everyone’s jumping on this, but Trump yelling “EAT THE TARIFFS”, in addition to being meaningless, is also quite in-line with the neolib/neoconservative presumption that companies will do the right thing for people.

      Bernie’s platform of Medicare for All, a $15 living wage, covering eye care and dental under Medicare… those all would be written into law. Encouraging Walmart to eat the tariffs is like trusting a corpo to pay workers a living wage.

    • bradorsomething@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      You don’t cheer for the bullet that killed Hitler; even though you approve of the outcome, you can still hate bullets and hate Hitler.

    • Zexks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      And that’s stupid. Where does he get off setting prices. Is this Russia. He fucked it up now his way of “fixing” it is to tell them to stop doing that. If he had a brain like Bernie he’d have come up with some legislation to promote American businesses instead of just trying to tax everyone.