No need to name names or sources.

Mine has to be some dude that insisted that advertising is a “30,000 year old technology”

  • dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    That using 100% free and open source software is more important than actually getting your work done.

    In a thread about Affinity Photo where someone insisted that we should all use gimp and just not edit photos if gimp doesn’t have the features we need rather than asking Serif to port their software to Linux.

    Also in several threads about migrating from Windows to Linux where every missing or complicated feature was brushed away with “just get used to not being able to do it, even if it’s critical to your workflow”.

    • jamescrakemerani@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m lucky in my job that most of my work can be done on Linux with FOSS software. But I would use Windows if this weren’t the case, and I know for some colleagues who need to work with specific proprietary software, there aren’t that many other options available, and its far easier for them to just use Windows (or perhaps macOS if they have the option).

    • socphoenix@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That is 10,000% people who don’t do creative work especially professionally. I am fine with gimp and darktable versus anything Adobe/paid but I also barely use them lol. I would be back off Linux in a heartbeat if I honestly couldn’t use something I needed even though I prefer it.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.devOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Medical work, too. Several exam machines only work with Windows. I’ve heard once that “wine’s pretty good nowadays”, which completely ignores the detail that it isn’t tested with said equipment and its drivers.

        Anything related to engineering, whether civil or mechanical, also goes with either Windows or Mac, because the free CAD options don’t hold a candle to AutoCAD and others.

        Lastly, there’s no FOSS alternative to completely replace Microsoft Active Directory, so offices where 90% of the work is done on the web browser won’t bother because they’ll be losing control over individual machines.

        There’s so much focus on “me” and “freedom” that they often forget there’s a whole damn world of different needs around them.

        • the16bitgamer@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I agree with this, outside of bs windows throws if you change the motherboard. Desktop Linux stability reminds me of Windows 7 levels of OS stability. Great for most, not for mission critical.

          With that said i feel you are being overtly critical to FOSS CAD software. I use FreeCAD in a professional setting and it is extremely stable, and for my use case it is as capable with no missing features. Yes the software isn’t beginner friendly, but I honestly found it made my designs more accurate since it had more constraints for sketches.

          • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            What were you using BEFORE FreeCAD if it has MORE sketch constraints?? Man, I found it so limiting compared to NX. Especially the sketching. And surfacing appeared to be basically nonexistent. Maybe I’m too spoiled with NX, but I dont think I could function for even a day on FreeCAD. It’s worse than SolidWorks (and I hate SolidWorks). I really, really wanted to like it. I even gave it a second chance when 1.0 dropped.

              • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Ah, ok. I’ve been using NX since it was still Unigraphics, so I am admittedly biased. I haven’t tried any of the newer things like Fusion or Sketchup. Might I ask what industry you use FreeCAD for at a professional level? Just curiosity. I’m automotive interiors tooling, so I’m pretty dependent on strong surfacing tools. Lots of A-surface stuff.

                Also, how would you model this up in FreeCAD? This took me about 15 minutes in NX, with one sketch and some offset curves. I was making a 3D printed tag for my daughter.

                I tried for over two hours in FreeCAD, but only got this far. I could not extrude individual bodies from one sketch, I had to make separate sketches for each shape. Offset curves didn’t appear to be a thing, and I couldn’t find any form of synchronous modeling tools. So, making those raised outlines was a whole other challenge. I ended up having to extrude a sheet taller than the main body, then thicken it. I couldn’t figure out how to select face edges for use in other commands, either. I ended up giving up.

                • the16bitgamer@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I use freecad for mainly functional 3D Prints, many of which I sell on Etsy and eBay. You can see my designs here: https://www.printables.com/@16bitvirtual/models

                  As for how to do yourbunny. For the most part, you are falling into the biggest hurdle for FreeCAD. FreeCAD has constructing geometry which cannot interfere with the model. But it also means that if you aren’t very specific with your design it will fail. For example with the Bunny you need to define in your sketch what you’d like to pad or pocket out.

                  Then you work on adding details

                  The constructor lines are why I love FreeCAD since in other software I had to be very specific on what I can add without voids being accidentally added into my model.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I fucking hate this.

      Especially when they basically self-hypnosis themselves into the placebo affect and swear that their magic powdered crystal enema can fix everything.

  • RandomStickman@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    One of the first argument I’ve got myself into was returning the shopping cart to the designated spot. This person was replying to like 5 people at once justifying why they don’t always return the cart, because the weather is hot and the corral is far, etc. while we disapproved.

    Got some reddit argument PTSD from that lol

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Any time any user comments the word “based” to the most normal and reasonable shit ever.
    Based has lost all meaning.

  • Godric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I once got accused of having a corporate shill account after explaining how coupons work.

    Man was whingeing about paying full price for Domino’s and got pissed at me when I pointed out they didn’t use the 2 for 7 deal that takes up half their homepage.

    Some people just can’t admit they fucked up XD

  • Samsonreturns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Someone was trying to say the Van Halen’s song “Jump” was about suicide. Despite being presented with an interview with David Lee Roth (who wrote the song) explaining what the song was about. Still think about that. Idk why. Maybe because it was like one of those conversations you have with an edgy emo kid in highschool and realize they are full of shit. Some weird nostalgia I guess

  • dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    One that I read on Mastodon:

    Every bad thing about commercial software is the programmers’ fault. Even if it was something that management decided and the programmer fought against it and lost. They claimed you should rather risk losing your job than accepting an inconvenience for your user. Weird take but okay. Then they started comparing software engineers to soldiers “just following orders” during the holocaust. That’s where I blocked them. Cherry on top: they have “if you want to hire me as a software engineer, message me” in their bio. I wonder why nobody wants to hire them…

    • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      What kind of idiot can’t see the difference between “I’m going to implement this stupid feature that no one wants because my boss says I have to” and “I’m going to murder Jews because my boss says I have to”?

    • mehdi_benadel@lemmy.balamb.fr
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Blaming devs for management choices, clearly a bad take. Mocking people for standing for their values, and not being perfect soldiers at work : very shitty. We did not choose capitalism as a society. We have the right to protest against it, whenever its effects encumbers us.

  • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    That all small business owners are thieves and out to scam their customers - This was part of someone’s argument defending big box stores.

  • lath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    That you should always keep your graphics card updated to the latest drivers, especially Nvidia

    • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s not that ridiculous. If you’re frequently playing new games at launch (probably a bad idea for different reasons), then latest drivers often contain optimizations and fixes for specific games.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I do out of habit and 99% of the time it has zero downsides and occasional positives. It only borked a game and required rolling back one time that I can remember.

      I have a friend who is far more careful about doing their updates because they have frequent problems. Not sure why we have such different experiences.

  • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    In posts like this and elsewhere, commenters kept claiming the noun female to refer to a human is generally derogatory or offensive.

    Someone wrote

    Occasionally my partner does or says some things that remind me of the “manosphere” aka 4chan neckbeards.

    A perfect example was that he sometimes says “females” when he means “women”. I explain that it’s not a swear word but it’s still derogatory. I explain why. Once I did, he understood and stopped doing it.

    Despite abundant evidence here (search females), in classifieds, personals & online equivalents (eg, ads that limit eligibility to females), or text corpus searches revealing that the noun female referring to humans is often non-derogatory, so it all depends on the context, they’d insist that usage of the word itself is offensive, insulting, or disrespectful, and they wanted everyone taught to think that until it’s the generally accepted meaning. They didn’t seem to consider that promoting unconventionally sexist framings (ie, female is a dirty word) for wider adoption in our language serves sexists more than anything, and it might make more sense to resist that.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Outside of a purely descriptive term of the biological differences between the sexes, that is derogatory.

      It is often used to dehumanize women, as the term is mostly used when talking about animals.

      • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        So you didn’t look at the

        abundant evidence here (search females), in classifieds, personals & online equivalents (eg, ads that limit eligibility to females), or text corpus searches revealing that the noun female referring to humans is often non-derogatory

        did you?

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Why would I?

          You cite no source for what you write as if it was fact.

          The fact that you try to make it look like scientific language tells me that you actually know why the term is derogatory, and you doubling down makes me think you argue in bad faith.

          • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Confirmed: couldn’t even search females in lemmy. Disregards common classified ads. Claims “bad faith” while ignoring evidence in bad faith.

            Why would I?

            Because the claim is empirical, and yours violates plain observation?

              • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Statistics aren’t needed to reject an overgeneralization. On the contrary, you would need something like statistical generalization: you’re (over)generalizing the meaning of a word. Any counterexamples suffice to defeat a bad generalization, since no sample should contradict a true generalization: look it up or take introductory logic.

                You’re overgeneralizing, and only asserting your claim doesn’t begin to meet the burden to support that. In contrast, I’ve indicated evidence exists & where it’s readily found, which you ignore. Ignoring evidence that doesn’t suit you is a fallacy (often committed in bad faith).

                The fact remains that counterexamples to your claim are common, which wouldn’t be expected if the conventional meaning were derogatory.

                Here’s an example quoting a story in the news:

                “What if I would have been armed,” she said. “You’re breaking in. What am I supposed to think? My initial thought was we were being robbed—that my daughters, being females, were being kidnapped. You have guns pointed in our faces. Can you just reprogram yourself and see us as humans, as women? A little bit of mercy. […]"

                So your claim is that by referring to her daughters as females, this mother is insulting them?

                While I might be able to argue in “bad faith”, the unsolicited speech productions of the community do not. Do you want to ignore more examples?