This was not inevitable. This is a war Israel chose. It could have been prevented. Diplomatic talks were ongoing when the bombers took off for Iran. Israel’s continuing, illegal, unjustified airstrikes are unlikely to achieve their stated aim – permanently ending Tehran’s presumed efforts to build nuclear weapons – and may accelerate it. They must stop now. Likewise, Iran must halt its retaliation immediately and drop its escalatory threats to attack US and UK bases.
This conflict is not limited, as was the case last year, to tit-for-tat exchanges and “precision strikes” on a narrow range of military targets. It’s reached a wholly different level. Potentially nothing is off the table. Civilians are being killed on both sides. Leaders are targets. The rhetoric is out of control. With Israel fighting on several fronts, and Iran’s battered regime backed against a wall, the Middle East is closer than ever to a disastrous conflagration.
Reasons can always be found to go to war. The roots of major conflicts often reach back decades – and this is true of the Israel-Iran vendetta, which dates to the 1979 Islamic revolution. The so-called “shadow war” between the two intensified in recent years. Yet all-out conflict had been avoided, until now. So who is principally to blame for this sudden, unprecedented explosion?
Answer: three angry old men whose behaviour raises serious doubts about their judgment, common sense, motives and even their sanity.
TheGuardian readers started getting turned off because they started noticing the paper is a propaganda rag.
Why do you think it took TheGuardian more than a year to finally shift tone against Israel and allow some opinion articles?
More than a year? There is a 2023 article calling it a genocide and zionism. I have linked tens of articles above ranging from 2023 to 2024 with similar tones. I have not seen any links from you that support your claims.
I never saw that 2023 article before. Must have been buried in the back beneath TheGuardian their fake rape claims of october 7
Here is the actual news which you will NEVER see TheGuardian publishing:
No rape allegations filed from 7 October, reveals Israeli prosecutor
I agree the tone of the article is extremely biased (the same author (Guardians Jerusalem correspondent I believe) did at least went on to document many civilian deaths on the Palestinians side as well at least). Guardian also reports on the other side of the story too:
Claims of Israeli sexual assault of Palestinian women are credible, UN panel says
and many others. So this is to me more a case of bad journalism rather than a biased reporting as a result of general journal policies. Were it the latter case, we would not be able to see all the other articles I linked and the same author would not write articles such as
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/apr/24/new-details-on-killing-of-paramedics-in-gaza-appear-to-contradict-idf-account
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/apr/19/gaza-palestinians-israeli-aid-blockade
This is not what biased media is. What you linked looks more like a hastily written article without waiting for resolution of all the evidence, perhaps because the author took the supposed description of events too emotionally. I agree though, it would have been much better if that news was presented in the form of laying all the facts neutrally and leaving it there such as:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_and_gender-based_violence_in_the_October_7_attacks
The fact that Israeli government tried to created a distorted perception of what happened during the Hamas attacks or is committing genocide in Palestine does not clear Hamas of killing (in some cases violently) and kidnapping civilians though. So there is that. Fuck state of Israel, fuck Islamist terrorist organizations who forces their msoygnistic world views on the populace the moment they get control of a citt. So there is that just to clarify my perspective on the matter.