Spotify, SoundCloud and other platforms have pulled the song, but its spread underscores the challenges tech platforms face in removing content that violate their policies.

Spotify, SoundCloud and other tech platforms have worked to remove a new song from Ye that praises Adolf Hitler, but the song and its video have continued to proliferate online including across X, where it has racked up millions of views.

On various mainstream and alternative tech platforms this week, Ye, formerly known as Kanye West, has been able to share his latest song, titled “Heil Hitler,” along with its companion title, “WW3,” which similarly glorifies Hitler, the architect of the Holocaust.

While some platforms have taken steps to attempt to pull down the song, others have seemingly let it spread freely.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Um, you have to be a special sort of moron to be Black and a fan of Hitler…sure, those Nazis might be your bud for a little while, and maybe use your money and fame to fund their cause. Right up until the Night of the Long Knives 2.0.

  • Pnut@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I feel like Canada and Mexico are a few days away from being an old man that stands up from his rocking chair, grabs an old shotgun and goes “well. I guess it was comin’”

  • SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Whether he needs help or not I don’t know but what I do know is that we need to stop giving this man any attention.

    • KelvarIW@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      With all these reactionaries - Ye, JK Rowling, PragerU, Heritage Foundation, etc - We need to stop cross-posting their hate speech. All that does is risk spreading their views. I don’t know why people who (rightfully) criticized CNN for airing Trump’s full speeches, do the same with personalities who aren’t even running for political power.

      All it does it give mentally-ill attention seekers like Ye encouragement.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 hours ago

    You mean kanye west? After all a empty right wing ball sack like him doesn’t like preferred names or pronouns.

  • andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    In case you’d like the lyrics for this “masterpiece”:

    [Verse 1: Ye] Man, these people took my kids from me

    Then they froze my bank account

    I got so much anger in me

    Got no way to take it out

    Think I’m stuck in the Matrix

    Where the fuck is my nitrous

    Yes, I am a cuck, I like when people fuck on my bitch

    With shit that I’m postin’ on Twitter they tellin’ me, “Ye, don’t say that”

    How n*ggas can see me in public im drivin an all-chrome Maybach

    With all of the money and fame I still can’t get my kids back

    With all of the money and fame I still don’t get to see my children

    N*ggas see my Twitter, but they don’t see >how I be feeling

    So I became a Nazi, yeah, bitch, I’m the villain

    [Chorus: Ye] Ngga, Heil Hitler Ngga, Heil Hitler They don’t understand the things I say on Twitter Ngga, Heil Hitler They don’t understand the things I say on Twitter All my nggas Nazis, ngga, Heil Hitler Ngga, Heil Hitler Ngga, Heil Hitler All my nggas Nazis, ngga, Heil Hitler She wanna fuck in Japan, I put the chrome on the Benz (Ngga, Heil Hitler) She reaching down to my pants, she got the world in her hands

    [Chorus: The Hooligans] Ngga, Heil Hitler Ngga, Heil Hitler Ngga, Heil Hitler All my nggas Nazis, ngga, Heil Hitler Ngga, Heil Hitler Ngga, Heil Hitler All my nggas Nazis, ngga, Heil Hitler Ngga, Heil Hitler Ngga, Heil Hitler Ngga, Heil Hitler N*gga, Heil Hitler

    [Outro: Adolf Hitler] Du meine Arbeit für richtig hältst Ob du glaubst, dass ich fleißig gewesen bin, dass ich gearbeitet habe Dass ich mich in diesen Jahren für dich eingesetzt habe, dass ich anständig meine Zeit verwendet habe im Dienste meines Volkes. Gib du jetzt deine Stimme ab, wenn “JA”, dann tritt für mich ein, so wie ich für dich eingetreten bin!

    This is a severely mentally man who needs help. This is not a song that should have had people working on it. This should not have been released. I have had a in-depth conversation with something who believed that Shrek was the incarnation of God and they were more cogent than this.

    Kanye was always a strange and not great lyricist, but this is mental illness.

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      34 minutes ago

      You can use \* instead of * to get the asterisk to appear. Otherwise it will italicize.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 minutes ago

        Honestly, messing with the formatting of the first verse was enough. My phone can’t regex, and I really despise that word too much to try to fix it. I’m not inclined to put more effort into the formatting as Ye did into the lyrics themselves.

    • xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      i kinda see his nazism as a metaphor now… he’s saying he’s treated like a nazi so might as well say he’s a nazi.
      or, he’s so demonized then “fine, i’m a demon”.
      my take on it is: shitty artist + mentally ill.

      also, interesting that he’s a cuck, and super worried about being called gay… (check out his reaction to the fish sticks south park).
      you don’t have to be gay but, it definitely involves being sexually excited by other men…
      i’m thinking, lying to himself level of closet gay

    • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      mentally [ill] man who needs help.

      I agree with this. A while back he did an interview with Lex Fridman. For those not familiar with Lex, he does long-form interviews of an hour or more that get into great detail on various subjects, and he makes a point to educate himself on those subjects beforehand so it is an actual discussion, not the usual interview of a guy explaining his job to somebody who has never heard of it.

      For anyone not convinced Ye needs help, please go listen to that interview.

      Ye early on blames the ‘Jewish media’ for an awful lot of the world’s problems. Lex encourages him to call out specific members of that media for specific problems, rather than writing off an entire religion and an entire industry. Lex encourages him to use his platform to identify bad actors and directly oppose them. Ye refuses any specifics, talking only in broad general terms.

      Ye then says with full conviction that we should stop teaching history in schools, that it is a waste of time and resources to relive the past and we should be teaching science and math and engineering instead as history offers us little or nothing of value. Lex of course brings up several parallels between history and modern society and similar problems happening under similar situations, once again Ye refuses to acknowledge and keeps restating his point in different words.

      These are just two of the bigger issues. I got about halfway through the interview before I concluded that this man has no fundamental understanding of how the world works or of how human nature works, that he was either deluded or mentally ill or just very stupid, let his positions are almost entirely without merit and that he is a person and his ideas are probably unworthy of any consideration of mine. For me that’s a pretty big thing, I try to separate the person from the idea and give everybody equal consideration.

      But after listening to Ye speak for half an hour, I concluded it was the same as going to a mental hospital and listening to one of the patients rant about how aliens ate their brain for half an hour- The only thing I get from the experience is half an hour older.

      I don’t know what is wrong with Ye. Maybe he is just uneducated and ignorant and managed to fail upwards because he’s good at music. Maybe he is mentally ill. I don’t know. But I do know that he is not a smart or intelligent person that we should be listening to in any capacity.

      • Sciaphobia@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        54 minutes ago

        The only thing I get from the experience is half an hour older.

        That was a fire line, and I’m stealing it.

        • nomy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Some rich asshole once said, “When you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.”

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        I’m pretty sure after his mother died, (of complications from a weight loss procedure he paid for), it broke him. He started abusing nitrous, Kim K tried to keep him compliant with doctors and meds, but eventually gave up to keep the kids safe.

        I am convinced that he has always been neurodivergent - possibly autistic. He’s always had strange lyrics, but was a genius producer. He had his finger on the pulse for what kinds of sounds to bring out of SoundCloud and other spaces - you see in Yeezus that he’s kinda bringing the experiments of groups like CLPPNG and Death Grips to the mainstream.

        He’s also going through some serious creative decline. Life of Pablo was strained. He’s resorting to shit like AI. That cannot feel good. He knows that something is wrong, but has to externalize it because of his “god” persona.

        The comparison to someone in an asylum is apt. If he wasn’t rich, those song lyrics would have been written on a bathroom wall in feces.

        He needs help, not a microphone.

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I have had a in-depth conversation with something who believed that Shrek was the incarnation of God

      I would love to hear their reasoning. That is fascinating.

      • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Some modern religious philosophies (most notably Chaos Magick) essentially believe that thoughts, symbols, ideas, and cultural concepts gain power through their spread and repetition. Within this framework, Shrek may as well be a god because he’s the center of a popular media franchise and the basis of many popular memes. By saying “Shrek is Love, Shrek is Life” it becomes real in a sense. That’s kind of where I think that would be coming from. I’ve seen people make similar arguments about batman and mickey mouse being their personal gods.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        They also included flubber. Flubber represented the Trinity - because it is neither a solid nor a liquid. God is a translucent Shrek made out of flubber.

        That was the gist of it, across thirty minutes. The friends next to us were having a conversation about how both of them were vampires and their dad had power over storms.

        It was a college volunteer project where I was trying to come up with volunteer projects to connect folks to the community. Was fun - we crocheted granny squares for baby rhinos.

  • horse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    So platforms (rightfully) remove this song, but are happy to let him have an account and make money off his other songs? If they actually cared, he would have been banned a long time ago…

    • jsomae@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      32 minutes ago

      If they remove his other songs, his fans might gravitate to other platforms. This is why they don’t remove his other songs.

    • mycamgirl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      His other songs like from years ago? Maybe those don’t belong to him and the platform does not remove those because that would punish a completely different entity that has nothing to do with what Kanye does now. All his songs prior to 2012 are owned by Def Jam (universal music subsidiary)

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 hours ago

        He’s got another song on that album about showing a younger (?) cousin porn and having sucked his dick. That cousin is in prison for murdering someone. Now, children are curious and child perpetrated sexual abuse is a complicated and messy topic for professionals, but I don’t think you have to be a professional to say “yeah, probably not a good idea to release that.”

  • andallthat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    13 hours ago

    When we say “Ye did this”, how many people actually recorded, played, produced, published this? I know next to nothing about modern music production, so maybe now he can do all of that at home with a laptop and an internet connection, but if there are others making money out of a clearly unstable person and getting none of the hate, I’d like at least to try and avoid giving them my money

      • WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Why do you think they pretty much all end up overdosing, unaliving themselves

        I think a huge part of the reason suicidal people feel so alone is because society absolutely refuses to talk about it.

        If you choose to self censor to make your content more friendly to advertisers while robbing vulnerable suicidal people of the language they need to be taken seriously, of course people are going to end up “unaliving” themselves because of it.

        Imagine trying to explain you’re suicidal to a friend who isn’t even capable of hearing the word “suicide”.

        • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          People pretend to care until you actually ask for help.

          Talking about how we really feel pushes people away.

          • WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I’m really sorry you had that experience, but from my own I don’t find that’s always true. I don’t struggle with suicide per se but I do get intrusive thoughts telling me too and these really scared me when they first started happening because I didn’t understand the weren’t from me.

            I’ve talked about this with at least 4 or 5 of my close friends and they all understood and many even related and have their own struggles.

            I’ve had friends who self harmed, friends who have threatened to harm themselves, everytime we had a heart to heart about something like that it’s only brought us closer.

            • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I think for me at the point the pessimism and bitterness has taken over and I see the worst in everything seemingly all the time. I usually don’t talk about what I’m thinking because it’ll come off as complaining and negativity when in reality I’m just so tired of everything being so fucked up.

              Instead of burdening others, I don’t say anything. I feel like I’m silently drifting towards suicide. Even if I say the most offending problems out loud nothing will change because all the problems stem from human nature itself.

              There was a streamer I used to watch that ended up killing himself. Before he did it he was talking about whether life is a simulation and that killing himself might get him to the next “level”… And that’s honestly stuck with me. He was successful, popular, loved etc… and yet that wasn’t enough. There’s no way this can be all there is to life.

              • WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                I understand what you mean. That’s sort of what I was expressing my frustration about earlier is that I think society makes it that way. You aren’t being negative or complaining, these things are completely normal but we don’t treat them as normal. We don’t really have examples of how to initiate these conversations in healthy ways. Even the word suicide itself feels so heavy.

                The heavier society makes that feel, the more you think you’re putting a burden on someone that you aren’t.

                Did you know suicide is the 10th leading cause of death in the US?

                Usually the only time suicide is brought up its for drama on some show.

                Instead of burdening others, I don’t say anything. I feel like I’m silently drifting towards suicide. Even if I say the most offending problems out loud nothing will change because all the problems stem from human nature itself.

                Do you mind if I ask what it is you’re expecting to change?

                Talking to someone isn’t necessarily about solving all your root problems but to just help yourself get out of your own head about it.

                It’s like an alcoholic going to their first AA meeting or someone with PTSD going to their first therapist session. That one conversation isn’t going to change everything, but it might give you support and help you realize that other people are struggling with the same things and even some people have found successful ways of digging out.

                There was a streamer I used to watch that ended up killing himself. Before he did it he was talking about whether life is a simulation and that killing himself might get him to the next “level”

                What about that connects with you?

                You’ve mentioned before you push these feelings down and wear a sort of mask in front of others instead of burdening them. Is it possible that by choosing to cut yourself off from others, you’re preventing yourself from having real connections and so they end up feeling artificial and simulated?

  • pleasegoaway@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    15 hours ago

    So when is he going to get a conservatorship?

    He’s clearly in need of others making decisions for him.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Part of the song is complaining about how he can’t access his bank account, so maybe there’s action there.

      But we all know conservatorships are really for when your child who you relentlessly groomed as a sex object wants to start keeping her own money. (How much do you think Dan Schneider paid off the family to keep anyone from knowing who her sisters baby daddy was?)

    • excral@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      He should just jump into the sea and start living with other gay fish

      • Raltoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I can’t believe it was that incident that revealed Snopes as a nazi outlet(they basically said it was impossible to tell and talked about “not being able to read his mind”. And they have made zero attempts at correcting the article or changing their stance, so they stand by what was written)

        • andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          9 hours ago

          They desperately sane wash Trump.

          I wonder if it’s connected to the drama behind the site. There was a really good breakdown I read about how a war between the guy and his ex wife over who got to own it…

          • ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Can I just say, I fucking hate that line in particular. It’s a thought-killing cliché.

            Of course we can’t know what’s in anybody’s mind or heart. So we have to go by their actions. And his actions were, quite plainly to anybody with eyes, a Nazi salute. And honestly, it’s not surprising or shocking that he would do one; his other actions around the world scream “Nazi”.

            Man, for years, I had right wing dickbags telling me Snopes was leftist propaganda because it debunked all their crazy bullshit. And now they go and pull something like this.

  • klu9@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Ye was briefly able to upload the song to the popular music streaming services Spotify and SoundCloud.

    Isn’t SoundCloud in Germany? [Checks Wikipedia] Yes, it is.

    Isn’t promotion of Hitler and Nazism in Germany a serious crime? [Checks Qwant] Yes, it is.

    E.g.

    Imprisonment, not exceeding five years, or a fine, will be the punishment for whoever, in public or in an assembly, approves, denies or minimizes an act described in § 220a(1) [i.e., genocide] committed under National Socialism, in a manner which is liable to disturb the public peace.

    EXTRADITE KANYE!

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 hours ago

      When I think of Chapelle now, I think of the time he had Musk on stage and call his audience poor for booing Musk.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    281
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    It’s literally called “Heil Hitler”.

    I think anyone who defends him needs to back up now.

    • Refurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      "Hey, now, maybe he was just trying to “put his heart out” to people. Also he’s autistic or something.

      Him saying “I looooove Hitler” on Alex Jones was just him saying “I don’t love Hitler”, but in secret code."

      - MAGA, probably

    • N0t_5ure@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      75
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Whoah, whoah, we don’t want to be jumping to conclusions about who may, or may not, be a Nazi. /s

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        removeds See My Twitter But They Don’t See How I Be Feeling So I Became A Nazi

        Lyrics from the song

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        93
        ·
        22 hours ago

        We’re throwing ourselves toward an authoritarian and dystopian future.

        Precisely why we must not allow the glorification of nazism to perpetuate.

        Be the change you desire

        That’s illegal.

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        Totally wrong on this one. Your rights end where others begin. Is it OK if a guy writes a song about torturing and killing you. You specifically. No? What about 3 songs? 10 songs?

        There’s a very clear line in free speech. You are free to say what you wish WITH IN NORMAL PARAMETERS! Does this protect some hate speech, or what a targeted group might see as hate speech? A bit. But not the brazen stuff. You want to stand on a corner and talk about how the pope controls the weather? OK. You want to stand on a street corner and clearly call people to violence to harm Catholics and their property? No. That’s not free speech. You aren’t allowed to call people to violence.

        Is praising Hitler, and other neo nazi garbage hate speech? Yes. It’s hate speech. There’s no Hitler that didn’t kill millions of people. There’s no nazi party that didn’t call people to action and violence. You don’t have the freedom to stand on a street corner and clearly make appeals to specific violence. That’s never been allowed.

      • logos@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        20 hours ago

        The government isn’t silencing him. Private entities are deciding not to support it. Forcing them to would be against free speech.

        • ryannathans@aussie.zoneBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          36
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Over here it’s the government cracking down on music, and that’s the lens I have

          Private entities should be free to delist content (or not) of their own choice

      • nthavoc@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        75
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Dude. There’s a limit to that expression. There’s a reason why nobody likes Nazi’s and they deserve a punch in the face at minimum. Don’t be on the repeat side of history by performing some kind mental gymnastics to preserve freedom of expression and inadvertantly protect Nazism with that argument. That’s what apologists do now and did in the past.

        Always remember this: if you have 10 people eating dinner at a table and 1 of them is a Nazi, how many nazi’s do you have? The answer is 10 Nazis.

      • PolarKraken@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        51
        ·
        21 hours ago

        You need to spend some time thinking on the (misnamed) “paradox of tolerance”. The idea you’re espousing is exactly the most critical, fundamental misunderstanding of tolerance as a moral value.

        The “paradox of tolerance” is the idea that one must even tolerate the intolerant - it would be a paradox because this tolerance ultimately ensures the unbridled spread of intolerance. Folks weakly on the left have misunderstood this forever.

        But there is no paradox, never has been. Tolerance must never be given to the hatefully intolerant. Nazism can never be tolerated, it must be defeated as quickly as possible everywhere it sprouts up. And I do absolutely mean violently, I am not talking about just simple ostracism or censorship.

        A society that tolerates the hatefully intolerant is fully doomed. Please, come to realize that you are not advocating for anything high-minded, you are advocating for the destruction of all things beautiful, art or otherwise.

        • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          29 minutes ago

          it would be a paradox because this tolerance ultimately ensures the unbridled spread of intolerance. Folks weakly on the left have misunderstood this forever.

          While I can’t read what you’re responding to, that doesn’t follow (it can be ignored or protested) & no, they haven’t.

          The paradox of tolerance doesn’t lead to a unique conclusion. Philosophers drew all kinds of conclusions. I favor John Rawls’:

          Either way, philosopher John Rawls concludes differently in his 1971 A Theory of Justice, stating that a just society must tolerate the intolerant, for otherwise, the society would then itself be intolerant, and thus unjust. However, Rawls qualifies this assertion, conceding that under extraordinary circumstances, if constitutional safeguards do not suffice to ensure the security of the tolerant and the institutions of liberty, a tolerant society has a reasonable right to self-preservation to act against intolerance if it would limit the liberty of others under a just constitution. Rawls emphasizes that the liberties of the intolerant should be constrained only insofar as they demonstrably affect the liberties of others: “While an intolerant sect does not itself have title to complain of intolerance, its freedom should be restricted only when the tolerant sincerely and with reason believe that their own security and that of the institutions of liberty are in danger.”

          Accordingly, constraining some liberties such as freedom of speech is unnecessary for self-preservation in extraordinary circumstances as speaking one’s mind is not an act that directly & demonstrably harms/threatens security or liberty. However, violence or violations of rights & regulations could justifiably be constrained.

          A point of clarification: tolerance has a number of paradoxes identified in the SEP, and the paradox in discussion is more precisely called the paradox of drawing the limits.

          Opposing basic civil liberties like freedom of expression is very authoritarian & small-minded. Basic rule on policymaking: don’t give yourself powers you wouldn’t want your opponents to have.

          Quoting A Man of All Seasons

          Yes, I’d give the Devil benefit of law for my own safety’s sake!

          Sacrificing basic civil liberties when they don’t suit you is a threat to everyone. Their willingness to do that is why everyone hates authoritarians. It’s cutting off your nose to spite your face.

          There are better ways to beat these shitheads, and it’s been done before. Contrary to what you wrote, defending civil liberties regardless of whose is high-minded & defends everyone.

      • arrow74@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        I don’t know why this has to keep being repeated. It’s not hard.

        Free speech does not mean you are entitled to have a private entity like a website host your content or speech.

        He is welcome to sing this on the streets. He is welcome to publish this himself, be it hosted by a website he creates or in a physical medium.

        He is not entitled to it being placed on retail shelves. He is not entitled to have it hosted on YouTube or Spotify.

        This isn’t hard. The government of the United States has made absolutely no moves to silence this song. He can sing it and personally distribute it as much as he wants. But no one can be forced to distribute it for him

        • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          But why educate others wrong? You may not sing heil Hitler on the streets. It is a hate crime

          • arrow74@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            That depends on your country. In Germany singing this song on the street would be illegal.

            In the USA where Kanye lives and produced this song it is perfectly legal to sing in the streets.

        • ryannathans@aussie.zoneBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          No one is claiming private entities have to host it lol, did you even read my entire comment? I literally wrote private companies can delist what they want

          • arrow74@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            So you’re ranting about what exactly? Kanye has faced no repercussions from the government. The only thing that’s happened was backlash from fans and private entities not hosting his songs.

            Still trying to find the “attack on free speech” you ranted about

            • ryannathans@aussie.zoneBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              27
              ·
              edit-2
              17 hours ago

              Not “ranting” about anything. In Australia the government cracks down on music. Don’t be like us.

              • Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Dude, this song is practically an ode to the current US government. He’ll probably play the orange turd’s birthday parade. This isn’t a warning that’s necessary here.

      • belastend@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        The guy is once again professing his love for Hitler. This song is normalizing the Usage of Heil Hitler. How the fuck do you not see that?

      • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Yep, so in Australia NSW police have been contacting Spotify/YouTube/etc with requests to delist certain songs from Sydney drill rap bands that glorify and promote gang violence against Spotify’s/Youtube’s/etcs policies, the streamers have in some cases agreed and delisted the music, in other cases they have not and the music remains. This is after the groups theyve had issues with (eg One-Four) have caused multiple riots and had several charges and convictions, so it’s arisen from a desire to serve public good. Only certain tracks have been targeted from what I can see, not whole albums or artist catalogs.

        That’s a far cry from the government deciding what art people can or cannot listen to in my opinion. They have only asked some streaming platforms to adhere to their own policies, and then tbe platforms have made their own decisions on case by case basis.

        Is there other actions I’m not aware of? The govt hasn’t passed any laws to block the sale of drill rap nor banned its play on radio etc?

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Is it still music and art that should be platformed when it calls for genocide?

        Edit: whoops I fell for sealioning again

        • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          The sun beams down on a brand new day
          No more welfare tax to pay
          Unsightly slums gone up in flashing light
          Jobless millions whisked away
          At last we have more room to play
          All systems go to kill the poor tonight

          Gonna kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the poor
          Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the poor
          Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill the poor tonight

          Should the song I quoted be banned? If not, where exactly do you draw the line?

            • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              No, it’s Dead Kennedys. It’s written by gigantic leftist Jello Biafra and intended as satire.

              I don’t think Kanye’s song is satire. I think he’s mentally ill and meant every word to be taken literally. But I look at songs like Kill the Poor or California Uber Alles, and I start to doubt whether some stuffy old politician would be able to tell the difference in intent between those and Kanye’s song. I don’t think that old politician should be given the power to ban any of them.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        You are disgusting. Your argument is wack and holds no water. Social media has no obligation to host hate speech. Fuck you for being a bottom dwelling Nazi apologist.

        • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Not defending the OP but his argument is that here in Australia the government is doing the censoring, he’s all for platforms delisting it if they wish. As an aside, that’s effectively the same thing (as argued by people like Philip Adams here in Australia)

          As an Australian, I find government censorship of the arts problematic, this case is glaringly easy to agree with but there are a plethora of edge case issues that leave me feeling uneasy and I’m squarely on the side of Karl Popper with this.

          As to everyone “disliking nazis”, thats not true. Russia is led by one, as is the US and India, the current Austrian Government is led by a a political party set up by literal Nazis, across the border the AfD is praised by the US.

          Look at Hannah Ardent and Albert Einstein’s letter to the newspapers about the horror of Israel. So I’d suggest there is broad support for nazis, unless u mean literal nazis from Germany circa WW2, of which there aren’t many left but we had one in charge of NATO, another designing rockets for Nasa and on and on, so there is that.

          https://archive.org/details/AlbertEinsteinLetterToTheNewYorkTimes.December41948

          Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the “Freedom Party” (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formed out of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            This seems like it was written by AI as it addresses practically nothing written here but goes off on tangents. The couple pieces that were relevant are wrong. There is nothing here to suggest that government censorship has fuck all to do with Kanye’s “art” and also OP said jack fucking shit to indicate they’re ok with social media taking it down. They seem very opposed to it actually. Which is why everyone hates them.

      • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        20 hours ago

        And none of those platforms have to host the material. I don’t know what drill rap is.

        Who gets to decide? The gallery, the sculpture garden, and YouTube.

        I agree with you, BTW. However, I haven’t seen any government attempt to censor this song yet. Song sucks though, and I’m a fan of early Kanye.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        First of all, these are private companies, not governments. They can technically do whatever TF they want, and we probably shouldn’t have ceded so much power to them.

        …Anyway, I think you have a point. Or at least part of one.

        It’s reasonable to draw red lines like “no nazism on our platform.” But at the end of the day Spotify and such can ban whatever they want, with no repercussions since it’s basically a network of defacto, legally shielded monopolies.

        So how would we feel if, say, they started banning podcasts a little too popular and too critical of the president?

        In other words, banning nazism as a policy is fine, but arbitrarily banning what looks bad to them is indeed going to be a problem.

      • guillem@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        20 hours ago

        With the art excuse we are at the point that saying “heil Hitler” is not okay but singing it is okay.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Yeah, if he’s singing about how we should all gas the Jews, or kill all the Palestinians, or mass murder all Ukrainians, it’s all fine, it’s just art, you see?

        I’m glad I don’t have your big smooth brain

      • Squorlple@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Are you saying you think it’s ok to give a platform to content explicitly promoting genocide and Nazism so long as it has a beat?

      • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Are you saying that Germany should never have banned NSDAP?

        “If you don’t like the party, just don’t join it” is what you’re saying?

        🤔

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        That’s not really at issue here.
        This isn’t the government deciding what art is objectionable, and arresting those who play music they don’t like. This is a private company deciding what it wants to host in it’s library, that it curates, it pays license fees for, and sells subscriptions too. Ye or any Nazi absolutely has the right to make and sell any music they want. They however don’t have the right to force another company to sell their music for them.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        So if there is a new song that lists all of the high up government official’s addresses and tells everyone to kill them and a billionaire will give them a million dollars to do it, that would be cool? You think that would be art? Nah dude, those song people would get a knock on their door before the song plays though 10 times.

      • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        While this can certainly be interpreted as defending awful people (which I’m sure someone will, prepare for downvotes because many only read the first paragraph and do not understand nuance) with an awful message, I tend to agree with you.

        Music is art, and like any artwork its quality does not depend on its message. I have to admit that the gay fish was never the kind of artist I enjoyed simply because the rap tracks I like are few and far between. (Wtf is drill rap?)

        But to use a different angle: I’ve always been a metal head, and there’s quite a lot of black metal that I enjoy. And as most sensible people understand, that doesn’t make me a satanist, nor do I endorse burning of churches.

        So the obvious question is then: Is Ye’s newer stuff any good? Well, fuck if I know. I cannot name a single song Ye made. But he’s not exactly making it more tempting to try and like his stuff. Anyway, fuck him and fuck the horse he rode in on.

        EDIT: I did some research. I remember Golddigger. That’s all.