The Food and Drug Administration on Tuesday announced it will begin the process of pulling prescription fluoride drops and tablets for children off the market. The supplements are usually given to kids at high risk for cavities.

The federal government and some state legislatures are increasingly drawing attention to what they claim are the risks associated with fluoride, a mineral that’s been used for decades in community water systems, toothpastes and mouth rinses to prevent tooth decay.

Dentists fiercely contest the notion that the harms of fluoride outweigh the benefits.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 minutes ago

    So much for parents doing research and deciding if it’s right for them. Yet another bad faith argument.

  • weariedfae@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    49 minutes ago

    This reminds me of Swish. Did anyone else have Swish growing up?

    It was this program and I think they did it because like the entire community was on well water. Once a month they came in and had us rinse our mouths with this really high fluoride mouthwash. We had to swish it for like 2 whole minutes or something that seemed like a long time as a child.

    It was probably the only thing that saved my teeth growing up (neglectful parents).

    • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      30 minutes ago

      We did fluoride treatments but only at semi-annual dental checkups. It was a thick gel that they put in trays and we had to keep them in our mouths for a couple minutes. You had to lean over a sink and let any saliva just drip out because you weren’t supposed to swallow any of it.

      But I also was trained from an early age to brush with fluoride toothpaste every night before bed, so…

    • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      48 minutes ago

      I bet C will stay forever because some successful marketing campaign convinced people it’s a natural remedy against all types of colds and flu, despite being worthless for that cause.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Let’s go all out and replace them with meth. Instead of protecting teeth, we’ll eliminate them. Who needs a dentist when you have no teeth? Think of the savings!

    Lisa needs braces.

  • Binette@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I would’ve been so cooked. This will also just harm any neurodivergent kid with executive disfunction. That plus the autism registry shows a clear attack on neurodivergents.

    • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They’re weeding out the “untermensch.” The non-hetero, the mentally and physically disabled, the undesireable ethnicities, the criminals.

    • Basic Glitch@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Same! We moved to a place with well water when I was ~5 and my parents made me use the fluoride rinse

      I hated it bc it was like an extra step, but I was literally the only kid in my school to never have cavities even though I would try to skip brushing all the time. And yeah you called it with the executive dysfunction, but didn’t find out I had ADHD until I was an adult

      • JustAnotherPodunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I grew up on well water. I still have well water as an adult. Finally swapping to a prescription grade flouride toothpaste is the only thing that has gotten my cavities in check. It’s been a struggle my entire life.

        Brushing twice a day did not matter. No sweets did not matter. I have basically no candy or sweet drink habits at all.

        I can directly attribute my lifetime of cavity problems to non flourinated water. My dentist agrees.

        This is going to wreck America’s health.

  • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    193
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    This is even more nuts than removing fluoride from municipal water systems. At least with that, parents who believe the science that their kids’ teeth will be better off with targeted fluoride treatment can buy the drops and tablets, and those who are afraid for some reason can choose to just not use it.

    This is just trying to ban access to fluoride entirely, despite research showing its benefits and the distinct lack of significant harm. Madness.

    What next, are they going to criminalize sending fluoride drops/pills through the mail, like mifepristone?

    Calgary, AB Canada removed fluoride and a decade later added it back after seeing the effects of its absence.

    • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They just banned it in Florida, with Meatball DeSatan calling it “forced medication,” and that if parents want their kids to have fluoride, they can give it to them. Now they want to ban those products, too.

      So now we’re just going to reconfigure our entire society to indulge the fantasies of conspiracy theory weirdos?

      • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        So now we’re just going to reconfigure our entire society to indulge the fantasies of conspiracy theory weirdos?

        Until Americans get off their couch and do something, yes.

      • arrow74@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        No reason to reconfigure anything. They have droves of people willingly agreeing to and gobbling this shit up. Our society is fundamentally broken

    • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      You could make a great movie about the fluoride prohibition of the 2020s.

      [Opening shot: A dark, rain-slicked cityscape. Neon signs flicker. A child’s toothbrush lies abandoned in a puddle.]

      Narrator (gravelly voice): In a world where fluoride is forbidden…

      [Cut to a sleek black SUV speeding through a checkpoint. Inside, a woman in a lab coat loads a capsule into a hidden compartment behind a false toothpaste tube.]

      Narrator: …one syndicate dares to keep the smiles alive.

      [Cue dramatic music. A warehouse door slams open. Inside: crates of fluoride tablets, glowing faintly blue. Armed guards in dental scrubs patrol the perimeter.]

      Agent Plaque (sternly): “They’re dosing kids in back-alley clinics. We need to shut them down—permanently.”

      [Montage: high-speed chases through suburban cul-de-sacs, a drone crashing into a jungle gym, a slow-motion shot of a fluoride pill flying through the air and landing in a glass of water.]

      The Molar (smirking): “You can take the fluoride out of the pharmacies… but you can’t take the sparkle out of the people.”

      [Cue epic music drop. Explosions. A toothbrush sword fight. A child grinning with unnaturally white teeth.]

      Narrator: This summer… the fight for dental freedom begins.

      FLUORIDE WARS: THE SPARKLE SYNDICATE

      Coming soon to a theater near you. Brush responsibly.

      • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        You could make a great movie about the fluoride prohibition

        We already have one: Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb.

    • minnow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      12 hours ago

      This is just trying to ban access to fluoride entirely

      Well yeah. These are extremists, absolutists, radicals. Their dogma must be simple and without exceptions. If they admit even one scenario where fluoride has more benefits than deficits, their whole ideology and worldview crumbles. Nuance is an existential threat.

      • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Hey everyone. It’s bad faith. Like, really bad faith. Watch OP say some stupid shit:

        A reasonable user mentions an obstacle to childhood toothbrushing:

        I see you haven’t interacted with many kids with special needs. Not everything in life can be easily “enforced” for everyone.

        OP:

        Sure. Niche cases exist. Prescriptions are still fine.

        Also OP, later in that same thread:

        It’s not hard to stick a toothbrush into a toddlers mouth. You don’t need a prescription.

        See how that works? Remember what this article is about?

        It’s bad faith conspiracy shit. Moderators? Anyone?

      • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Explain to me the science of how swallowing fluoride protects teeth.

        Easy, you don’t swallow them.

        They’re chewables.

          • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Yeah, I was prescribed them when I was younger (The wonders of living in a state that still doesn’t fluoridate the water supply). They were small little red pills that you had to chew on and then rub the “paste” on your teeth with your tongue.

            Imagine basically dehydrated toothpaste, had a chalky texture, not the greatest.

      • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        I do not assert that merely swallowing water with fluoride offers any benefit to do with dental health.

        It should be obvious that the act of directly swallowing water containing fluoride would give the water little to no opportunity to interact with one’s teeth, which would be required for the intended preventative effect.

        This is very similar to the decision by most nations to put low base levels of iodine in table salt. Given peoples’ daily habits and diet, it was determined to be a safe and reliable way of ensuring exposure to a needed substance for general health. Not everyone has or will have the discipline to apply fluoridated paste to their teeth regularly (hell, many people don’t even brush their teeth regularly!). Nor would many people take steps to ensure they had a recommended dose of iodine if they had to think about it, rather than just getting it through their daily meal …

        It should be clear to anyone that it’s the incidental daily, weekly, monthly, yearly cumulative effect of fluoridated water, even in the brief interval before it is swallowed, swishing in the mouth and in direct contact with teeth, that can be of benefit.

        Explain to me the science of how municipal fluoridation causes health issues so severe that it should be discontinued.

      • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Having fluoride in the water means that you are constantly maintaining a level of fluoride in your saliva which then integrates with the surface layer of your teeth throughout the day as you drink water. If you limit it to just toothpaste then that function only occurs for the small amount of time following brushing your teeth.

          • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            31
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            Jfc, multiple studies have shown that increased flouride in drinking water decreases the number of caries in the populations teeth. Its not homeopathic, if it was you wouldn’t even be talking about it because the levels wouldnt be testable. It’s not the ingestion that matters, its having the appropriate level of fluoride in the thing you put in your mouth all day every day that keeps the levels up in your mouth so your teeth keep absorbing it. The benefits of improved population dental health far outweigh the public monetary cost of doing it and the personal health cost to you, a person who brushes your teeth, which is zero.

              • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                14
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Luckily one of my friends has already been down the ridiculous path you’re travelling, so I’ve had the opportunity to spend quite a lot of time reading studies relating to this subject. I’m all good on the topic of water flouridation and dental hygiene thanks.

                The mechanism for preventing caries via fluoridated water is the same whether the water is treated by a municipality or treated at home. It is proven effective. Your tips on brushing are great, but they are only effective for the 2 to 3 half hour periods following that brushing. Fluoridated water prevents caries, that is a fact. So why rob yourself of a safety net for good dental hygiene?

                So as much as I ‘loved’ watching my friend descend into madness with anti fluoridation nonsense, I’ve had my fill. You asked for the scientific backed mechanism for how fluoridated water helps prevent caries, and I provided that. You clearly didn’t actually want that, so I’m done here. Have fun bud.

          • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            then you put it there using toothpaste

            You’d be astonished how many people don’t brush their teeth, so…

  • kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    13 hours ago

    RFK Jr. strikes again. I’ll never understand why people like him can’t grasp the idea that the difference between medicine and poison is often dosage.

    The amount of fluoride in these tablets is nowhere near unsafe levels. It’s not even close.

    • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      He literally doesn’t believe in germ theory.

      And I don’t mean ‘literally’ as in ‘figuratively’. He genuinely doesn’t believe in the most basic element of modern health and medicine.

      You can’t expect him to then grasp something as nuanced as dosage.

    • alaphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Dude took his grandkids swimming in a sewage infested waterway… I mean, you expect someone like that to have even the loosest grasp of anything resembling nuance?

  • andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    So - this started as a John Bircher thing right?

    I’ve just been befuddled at the purpose and the point of this conspiracy theory. I guess Alex Jones’s dad is a dentist (and a Bircher) but I doubt that dentists conspire for us to have bad teeth.

    Just generic “I don’t like the gubmit”? Was it a Jewish person who suggested that we improve dental health on a population level? What’s the initial bit of skin or hair that this stupid booger coalesced around?

    I guess these weirdos have always been around. We just didn’t put them in charge of health.

    • renzev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I doubt that dentists conspire for us to have bad teeth.

      People with bad teeth is literally their main revenue stream?! I wouldn’t put it past them.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    They try to make Americans weak, sick, and dead on all fronts. As of the US government was under control of a hostile country.

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    if you visit any of the reviews of FLOURIDE-free toothpaste, you can tell at least some of them have reported cavaties.

    • renzev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I once tried brushing my teeth with baking soda instead of toothpaste for a few weeks. From what I understand, they have about the same level of abrasiveness, so they should be about as good at scrubbing the gunk out of your teeth. The key difference is that toothpaste has fluoride in it. After a while I started having pain/irritation in my mouth and gums. It went away when I went back to toothpaste. So if anyone was looking for anecdotal evidence of fluoride being good for your teeth, there you go.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Oh, cute.

    I commented before that one can get 5 gallon bottled fluoridated water, and would like to again point that out. The fluoride may not be as concentrated as in these prescription-level things, but it’s available. Can throw it on a water cooler.

    Brick-and-mortar pickup:

    https://www.arrowheadwater.com/products/where-to-buy

    Delivery:

    https://www.readyrefresh.com/en/products/arrowhead-spring-water-delivery/arrowhead-5-gallon-water-with-fluoride/p/1311

    It looks like there are also some other brands, like Ozarka, but Arrowhead’s what I’ve used.

    • Michael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Why do that when you can get prescription-strength fluoride toothpaste from your dentist if you are concerned about your teeth? Your dentist will be able to tell if you need it or not. You could also look into varnishes and having custom trays made for your teeth that you leave in overnight to remineralize.

      Even regular OTC toothpaste is sufficient with proper application, a proper oral care regiment, and regular interventions from the dentist (e.g. cleanings every 6 months).

      Fluoride’s remineralization benefits are topical. Brush, spit excess, and leave toothpaste on 30 minutes before rinsing. Do not drink or eat anything during that period.

      Brush as directed, but at least two times a day. Proper flossing is critical as well. Do not leave acids on your teeth without rinsing with water and do not let plaque develop and stay on your teeth for extended periods, otherwise it hardens into tartar and can’t be removed at home.

      Obviously certain foods are better for your teeth than others. Grazing/snacking habits can potentially harm your teeth as well. Xylitol mints are a good thing to have during periods where you can’t brush. I suggest rinsing with water after consuming food, and especially rinsing after consuming acidic or sugary drinks, no matter where you are.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Because children have teeth that aren’t exposed to topical fluoride.

        Their future adult teeth, growing under their gums, in their jaws.

        The only way to build them strong is from the inside out, by getting fluoride into the children’s systems.

        • Rookwood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          33 minutes ago

          This is false. Fluoride is not absorbed in the body and transported to the teeth. It only works on contact with dental surfaces. You do not need fluoride to develop “strong” teeth. It only works on the exposed enamel. Growing teeth would only be impaired if the child had some other disease or deficiency, like calcium. Fluoride does nothing for developing future adult teeth.

          • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 minutes ago

            The existence of fluorosis, caused by an excess of fluoride being absorbed during tooth formation, before they begin to erupt, shows you’re wrong.

        • Michael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          The human body is able to produce strong teeth and enamel unassisted, our diets and habits do the damage. The body is unable to repair the damaged enamel without topical solutions.

          If you have a young child where topical fluoride is unadvised, consider nano-hydroxyapatite toothpaste, especially if they know how to spit out. I like Fygg’s brand, it’s made by dentists and the studies are promising. nano-HAp remineralization is less resistant to acid, so please consider fluoride as soon as possible.

          As always, consult with a dentist and get their advice before doing anything with your children’s teeth — including having regular check-ups with them.

          Maintaining systemic fluoride during development does seem attractive to develop tooth structure that is more resistant to acid throughout. However, I believe establishing and maintaining consistent care with dentists and developing solid oral health routines and diet practices, as early in life as possible, are all necessary steps to take and are more than sufficient.

          Enamel damage and tooth decay doesn’t magically happen, and education lasts for a lifetime.

          • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Obviously education about brushing and flossing and a healthy diet help more, if the family is able to afford the food and toothbrushes and regular dental care. But in areas where (natural or added) fluoride levels in the water are higher (within a limit of 1.5 ppm, twice what is set for when fluoride is added), there is observed to be less tooth decay and better overall dental health even when controlling the data for the elements you cited.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Because young children have teeth that aren’t exposed to topical fluoride.

        Their future adult teeth, growing under their gums, in their jaws.

        The only way to build them strong is from the inside out, by getting fluoride into the children’s systems.